If we take for granted that the evidence offered by expert testimony is not persuasive to most who understand the technology at stake, I can only imagine the RIAA thinks judge and jury will find it persuasive that the kazaa username on the mediasentry screenshot is "jrlindor." Does anyone else worry that the RIAA can win without providing technical evidence of infringement, but still achieving preponderance of the evidence?
Slashdot Mirror
12 Q. Do you have any idea why the case
13 hasn't been dropped by now?
14 MR. GABRIEL: Objection to form.
15 Lack of foundation.
16 A. I don't get involved with -- so no.
If we take for granted that the evidence offered by expert testimony is not persuasive to most who understand the technology at stake, I can only imagine the RIAA thinks judge and jury will find it persuasive that the kazaa username on the mediasentry screenshot is "jrlindor." Does anyone else worry that the RIAA can win without providing technical evidence of infringement, but still achieving preponderance of the evidence?