LOL. Glad to see you have a sense of humor?
You must not have been involved in ALL the ICANN issues over the past; else you would know I have not been a "canned spam" type of person. BUT, there are times when "canned spam" can feed the hungry more efficiently and better than going out to a dinner of steak (just to say you did). If the "canned spam" reeked, I would have said as much. Why add to something which is referenced Specifically if what is already said, says it Right? Sometimes, too much Talk (steak) is worse than a Simple reply (canned spam).
My points have been given to a lot of people who have taken the time to go to the ICANN forums and those who participated in the web cast of the Japan meeting. Everyone and their brother knows Voice of Reason is my tag. My statements as VOR presented on the ICANN forums were referenced specifically alongwith a couple of other names. I must have done something right or wrong:-) to get the mention of my statements being included by a member of the ICANN board. Believe this, some of my Opinions were not flattering at all to ICANN. However, they were presented in a manner to be constructive and I believe that is why they were included in the Japan meeting.
Ah, what the heck....I am kicking back at the computer for a few..reading and typing...
Oh, BTW, your statement "...but, perhaps this isn't something you're fit to get involved with"
is ah...well..um...gosh..let me think...oh, my..gee,..I can't seem to find the right words...
Guess I better revert to a "canned spam" reply.
Mox Nix.:-)
Best to You,
Teri
He (Teri)--who is me--is not a "he". He is a She. It doesn't matter though actually.
If something isn't broke, why fix it? The Proposition Paper being Referenced for Comment in this survey is pretty much Complete in it's basis.
I have had very Strong opinions (as presented on the ICANN forums) but, this specific Issue Referenced for this Survey already had a well laid out Document. Again, if it isn't broke, why fix it. There are many more issues which Need Fixing and Verbal Expressing. I am a Woman of few words when I see something which is Right. I support those Views in a Concise and Compact manner. This way it is Not as irritating to those who oppose my views. Get my drift?
I had to withdraw from the Candidate ballot--which I did-Monday morning due to business which will need my devoted time more so than I thought earlier. I withdrew because I feel that the Director chosen must be able to devote a lot of energy and time to ICANN issues and once I got word that my Company is taking off faster than we ever imagined, I knew in my heart that I could not serve as a Direction to the max it will require.
To the question..Why Endorse Whoever...I would hope that you and everyone will endorse the Candidate they feel serves the Needs of the Internet User. I already endorsed a Candidate. I put my vote for that Candidate in on Tuesday.
Best to You and All the Readers Here!
Later,
Teri Http://www.brittany-technologies.com
Slashdot Mirror
LOL. Glad to see you have a sense of humor? You must not have been involved in ALL the ICANN issues over the past; else you would know I have not been a "canned spam" type of person. BUT, there are times when "canned spam" can feed the hungry more efficiently and better than going out to a dinner of steak (just to say you did). If the "canned spam" reeked, I would have said as much. Why add to something which is referenced Specifically if what is already said, says it Right? Sometimes, too much Talk (steak) is worse than a Simple reply (canned spam). My points have been given to a lot of people who have taken the time to go to the ICANN forums and those who participated in the web cast of the Japan meeting. Everyone and their brother knows Voice of Reason is my tag. My statements as VOR presented on the ICANN forums were referenced specifically alongwith a couple of other names. I must have done something right or wrong :-) to get the mention of my statements being included by a member of the ICANN board. Believe this, some of my Opinions were not flattering at all to ICANN. However, they were presented in a manner to be constructive and I believe that is why they were included in the Japan meeting.
Ah, what the heck....I am kicking back at the computer for a few..reading and typing...
Oh, BTW, your statement "...but, perhaps this isn't something you're fit to get involved with"
is ah...well..um...gosh..let me think...oh, my..gee,..I can't seem to find the right words...
Guess I better revert to a "canned spam" reply.
Mox Nix. :-)
Best to You,
Teri
He (Teri)--who is me--is not a "he". He is a She. It doesn't matter though actually. If something isn't broke, why fix it? The Proposition Paper being Referenced for Comment in this survey is pretty much Complete in it's basis. I have had very Strong opinions (as presented on the ICANN forums) but, this specific Issue Referenced for this Survey already had a well laid out Document. Again, if it isn't broke, why fix it. There are many more issues which Need Fixing and Verbal Expressing. I am a Woman of few words when I see something which is Right. I support those Views in a Concise and Compact manner. This way it is Not as irritating to those who oppose my views. Get my drift? I had to withdraw from the Candidate ballot--which I did-Monday morning due to business which will need my devoted time more so than I thought earlier. I withdrew because I feel that the Director chosen must be able to devote a lot of energy and time to ICANN issues and once I got word that my Company is taking off faster than we ever imagined, I knew in my heart that I could not serve as a Direction to the max it will require. To the question..Why Endorse Whoever...I would hope that you and everyone will endorse the Candidate they feel serves the Needs of the Internet User. I already endorsed a Candidate. I put my vote for that Candidate in on Tuesday. Best to You and All the Readers Here! Later, Teri Http://www.brittany-technologies.com