i dont like the sentence on the InternetC++ Website: "You can have the real thing. Why program in proprietary languages, such as Java and C-Sharp that are incompatible derivatives of C++?"
who says or feels mindful enough that java is an incompatible derivate of c++? that guys which comes whith cheap marketing like "... you can have the real thing..."
does that people even know whats the difference between java, c# and c++ or even that derivative internetc++?
i keep believing in java. there are too much "things" coming (and also leaving) the time. java stays!
what got an operating system to do with an graphical user interface.
an operating system should be what its called. it should operate my system and thats not only for a day or two (like windows and macos too). i love that unix-machines down there in the server room. i think i havent seen some of the machines for years - the uptime is really amazing.
unix does best what its called to do: it operates the system. and that it does best of the rest for a very long time.
i dont know a fusion reaktor (very critical!), an backbone-provider or a telephon company, which ever would keep the trust on an macos!!! unix proves for more then 20 years that it can operate for a long time.
oh yes, you can recompile your whole system without having a downtime at all. and there is no other os like an unix or unixbased system which you can configure so specific for your needs.
btw: does the author know, that the new macos is unix based?
does he know, that the most complex graphical software is running on unix?
does he even know, that most parts of movie special effects are done on unix based graphics software?
does he even know ???
RelWorp
p.s.: i am still wondering about the aspect, what an os got to do with an gui???
while reading i just remembered the umts-auction here in germany which has finished last week with an outstanding total bidding of about $45.000.000.000 (~ DM 98.000.000.000) for 16 licenses for the umts-frequences of germany!!!
actually you need at least two licenses to provide a stable connection. so the companies paid as follows for every 2-licenses-package:
E-Plus Hutchison DM 16.418.200.000
Group 3G DM 16.446.000.000
Mannesmann Mobilfunk DM 16.473.800.000
MobilCom Multimedia DM 16.370.000.000
T-Mobil DM 16.582.200.000
VIAG Interkom DM 16.517.000.000
nervous? - i think so
the utms-standard provides up to 2MBit/s stable connection also while moving with a speed of up to 10 km/h.
but is this worth that price? i dont see it. at last the customers have to pay the price for that nevous chairmans who wanted to be one of the billion-dollar-bit.
when i see Qualcomms news now, which actually is (almost) ready for the market i can not see the "big deal" in umts for that price. qualcomms invention is an raise from 9.6 to 153 - which more than simply satisfaction for any of that guys running the street outside (most available private connectivity is about 56 to 112).
Slashdot Mirror
nobody needs it!
i dont like the sentence on the InternetC++ Website: ..."
"You can have the real thing. Why program in proprietary languages, such as Java and C-Sharp that are incompatible derivatives of C++?"
who says or feels mindful enough that java is an incompatible derivate of c++? that guys which comes whith cheap marketing like "... you can have the real thing
does that people even know whats the difference between java, c# and c++ or even that derivative internetc++?
i keep believing in java. there are too much "things" coming (and also leaving) the time. java stays!
RelWorp
what got an operating system to do with an graphical user interface.
an operating system should be what its called. it should operate my system and thats not only for a day or two (like windows and macos too). i love that unix-machines down there in the server room. i think i havent seen some of the machines for years - the uptime is really amazing.
unix does best what its called to do: it operates the system. and that it does best of the rest for a very long time.
i dont know a fusion reaktor (very critical!), an backbone-provider or a telephon company, which ever would keep the trust on an macos!!! unix proves for more then 20 years that it can operate for a long time.
oh yes, you can recompile your whole system without having a downtime at all. and there is no other os like an unix or unixbased system which you can configure so specific for your needs.
btw: does the author know, that the new macos is unix based?
does he know, that the most complex graphical software is running on unix?
does he even know, that most parts of movie special effects are done on unix based graphics software?
does he even know ??? RelWorp p.s.: i am still wondering about the aspect, what an os got to do with an gui???
while reading i just remembered the umts-auction here in germany which has finished last week with an outstanding total bidding of about $45.000.000.000 (~ DM 98.000.000.000) for 16 licenses for the umts-frequences of germany!!!
actually you need at least two licenses to provide a stable connection. so the companies paid as follows for every 2-licenses-package:
E-Plus Hutchison DM 16.418.200.000
Group 3G DM 16.446.000.000
Mannesmann Mobilfunk DM 16.473.800.000
MobilCom Multimedia DM 16.370.000.000
T-Mobil DM 16.582.200.000
VIAG Interkom DM 16.517.000.000
nervous? - i think so
the utms-standard provides up to 2MBit/s stable connection also while moving with a speed of up to 10 km/h.
but is this worth that price? i dont see it. at last the customers have to pay the price for that nevous chairmans who wanted to be one of the billion-dollar-bit.
when i see Qualcomms news now, which actually is (almost) ready for the market i can not see the "big deal" in umts for that price.
qualcomms invention is an raise from 9.6 to 153 - which more than simply satisfaction for any of that guys running the street outside (most available private connectivity is about 56 to 112).
--RelWorp