How are you drying your lawyers? Because without drying I find them quite soggy to begin with, and even with my current drying technique, I find they absorb liquids (like milk or gravy) all too readily.
Actually, it's the general public that decides the definition of planet, not the IAU. The general public wins because they have the most votes and weapons if it comes down to either democracy or war over it. So get used to it: Pluto is a planet.
You can go that way too, but since the java tools don't know about gosu it will look like a lot like a java reflection call, (looking up method by string name, arranging parameters into an array, etc).
I don't see anything stopping them from refining that in time though.
My point being that if you do that, you're sort of doomed, because now you've lost track of (or lost the ability to mark) const-ness in any location that calls TO a non-const-safe library.
It's happening because languages are nowhere near maturity yet. Give it another 150 years and we'll be down to about 5 or 6 commonly used languages. Right now no one has it adequately right.
It's certainly competing for attention with all of those. That said, it gets some things right (IMO) that none of those other languages do, and those things are important enough to make Gosu a more enjoyable language to work with.
Unfortunately, none of the huge library of java methods is marked const. You'd have to reimplement, for example, all of collections to make this useful.
Well, assuming they show up for your test, it would be a lot harder to fraud the ID. That is, a lot of people have standardized tests taken for them, using fake id. You'd probably get suspicious when a different person showed up for the followup interview than showed up for the test.
Another poster has pointed out how this would be of little use to most employers. I would add to that: it's also not supposed to be the goal of college. College is supposed to be life prep, not job prep. If you want job prep, just hire out of a technical school.
The problem is that research, even research done by those certified by top universities as intelligent, suggests that intelligence is better predicted by training than by genetics.
Actually, doing something really unique in high school and having average grades is a far safer course for getting into a selective school. In the good grades crowd, you're competing with 31,500 of the 32,000. If you've done something unique, you're only competing with the last 500. And the 7K slots are usually allocated 6500 for grades, 500 for unique.
The use of pirate for copyright infringement goes back only 40 years, to the best of my ability to research it. Can you provide any evidence for the hundreds of years claim?
only an idiot finds it necessary to make note of the obvious. and the idea that "correlation is not causation" is only a remarkable revelation to an idiot
Right, but the problem is that we have slashdot editors posting stories, and most of the top level responses are to those editors. So it might legitimately be a remarkable revelation.
There really doesn't need to be an argument for causation. Common causation resulting in correlation is perfectly adequate for insurance usage, firefox becomes a proxy for the root cause, which is probably management skills (e.g., you have poor management skills, so you can't keep yourself from getting viruses with IE, and wind up having to move to firefox).
It's purpose, but that is not the same as adult purpose. They lack the brain parts that an adult would use to make the same decision. However you would like to describe what is lacking, the fundamental issue is that they lack. They cannot make the same decision an adult would, because they are missing brain volume.
Slashdot Mirror
How are you drying your lawyers? Because without drying I find them quite soggy to begin with, and even with my current drying technique, I find they absorb liquids (like milk or gravy) all too readily.
Actually, it's the general public that decides the definition of planet, not the IAU. The general public wins because they have the most votes and weapons if it comes down to either democracy or war over it. So get used to it: Pluto is a planet.
How hard could it be to bounce a laser off of it for illumination?
This got modded funny? I don't want to complain about an upmod, but I was entirely serious. Anyone who thinks CS isn't in its infancy is deluded.
You can go that way too, but since the java tools don't know about gosu it will look like a lot like a java reflection call, (looking up method by string name, arranging parameters into an array, etc).
I don't see anything stopping them from refining that in time though.
I think the answer is: call any java code, including code involving non-reified generics.
My point being that if you do that, you're sort of doomed, because now you've lost track of (or lost the ability to mark) const-ness in any location that calls TO a non-const-safe library.
It's happening because languages are nowhere near maturity yet. Give it another 150 years and we'll be down to about 5 or 6 commonly used languages. Right now no one has it adequately right.
It's certainly competing for attention with all of those. That said, it gets some things right (IMO) that none of those other languages do, and those things are important enough to make Gosu a more enjoyable language to work with.
So use semi-colons. They are allowed, just not required.
Unfortunately, none of the huge library of java methods is marked const. You'd have to reimplement, for example, all of collections to make this useful.
Well, assuming they show up for your test, it would be a lot harder to fraud the ID. That is, a lot of people have standardized tests taken for them, using fake id. You'd probably get suspicious when a different person showed up for the followup interview than showed up for the test.
Why don't you just use your own test? That's what we do. And it isn't trivially cheatable, like the SATs or GREs.
1 song, downloaded how many times? If only 300K people downloaded from her, then the damages seem quite fair.
Another poster has pointed out how this would be of little use to most employers. I would add to that: it's also not supposed to be the goal of college. College is supposed to be life prep, not job prep. If you want job prep, just hire out of a technical school.
The problem is that research, even research done by those certified by top universities as intelligent, suggests that intelligence is better predicted by training than by genetics.
I think there's maybe an exception for known bottom of the bucket schools too. I mean, University of Phoenix is no 'any real college'.
Actually, doing something really unique in high school and having average grades is a far safer course for getting into a selective school. In the good grades crowd, you're competing with 31,500 of the 32,000. If you've done something unique, you're only competing with the last 500. And the 7K slots are usually allocated 6500 for grades, 500 for unique.
The use of pirate for copyright infringement goes back only 40 years, to the best of my ability to research it. Can you provide any evidence for the hundreds of years claim?
It's a huge lie. Everything on the web is in fact public domain.
only an idiot finds it necessary to make note of the obvious. and the idea that "correlation is not causation" is only a remarkable revelation to an idiot
Right, but the problem is that we have slashdot editors posting stories, and most of the top level responses are to those editors. So it might legitimately be a remarkable revelation.
That's entirely true. By selling their expensive, government provided cars, they would be significantly more likely to be able to afford college.
There really doesn't need to be an argument for causation. Common causation resulting in correlation is perfectly adequate for insurance usage, firefox becomes a proxy for the root cause, which is probably management skills (e.g., you have poor management skills, so you can't keep yourself from getting viruses with IE, and wind up having to move to firefox).
It's purpose, but that is not the same as adult purpose. They lack the brain parts that an adult would use to make the same decision. However you would like to describe what is lacking, the fundamental issue is that they lack. They cannot make the same decision an adult would, because they are missing brain volume.
Usually if you are old/mentally retarded/a child, your caregiver is held responsible.