What if the next version of gnutella/kazaa/whatever simply encrypts the IP address of the requester/server. Would it not require a reverse-engineering of the software to determine the method used to encrypt the IP address, thus not allowing the (RI|MP)AA to give the ISP a list of IP addresses?
Sure, this is just a variation on the old Pig Latin plugin, but why would it not be valid?
So, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this leave Google (and a slew of others) open to attack from $cientology because of both cached copies of pages, and supposedly copywrited documents?
Slashdot Mirror
What if the next version of gnutella/kazaa/whatever simply encrypts the IP address of the requester/server. Would it not require a reverse-engineering of the software to determine the method used to encrypt the IP address, thus not allowing the (RI|MP)AA to give the ISP a list of IP addresses?
Sure, this is just a variation on the old Pig Latin plugin, but why would it not be valid?
So, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this leave Google (and a slew of others) open to attack from $cientology because of both cached copies of pages, and supposedly copywrited documents?