I just wanted to see if I could spot a broad trend. I believe that the 60-70-80 rule is accurate. I intend to validate it (or invalidate it) by spidering several sites and seeing whether they follow the trend.
I agree that the sample is too small. I have posted the entire smaple I used for those who may be interested. The result of my effort here is a hypothesis which I hope to test by applying it to individual sites.
What about astro-physics?
on
Stopping Light
·
· Score: 1
Does anyone know if this has implications for astro-physicists? I mean, could something like this happen naturally, maybe even frequently in the early stages of the universe. Perhaps the light we're seeing from distant objects in the universe was stopped and then released again naturally. Wouldn't this distort the measurements we rely on for calculating the age of the universe?
Slashdot Mirror
I just wanted to see if I could spot a broad trend. I believe that the 60-70-80 rule is accurate. I intend to validate it (or invalidate it) by spidering several sites and seeing whether they follow the trend.
http://helen.lifeseller.com/webdecay.html
I agree that the sample is too small. I have posted the entire smaple I used for those who may be interested.
The result of my effort here is a hypothesis which I hope to test by applying it to individual sites.
The study I posted on Angelfire appears to have reached a bandwidth threshhold. I've made the same study available here:
http://helen.lifeseller.com/webdecay.html
I've also included a link to the raw data I used.
Does anyone know if this has implications for astro-physicists? I mean, could something like this happen naturally, maybe even frequently in the early stages of the universe.
Perhaps the light we're seeing from distant objects in the universe was stopped and then released again naturally.
Wouldn't this distort the measurements we rely on for calculating the age of the universe?