Yes, that's one of the unfortunate consequences of splitting the book into chapters that act like little essays. Some events explain multiple things so they end up in multiple places.
Still, I think this is better than arranging the book in strict chronological order. It can get downright dull going through 1984, 1985, 1986, etc.
Re::::Free for All::: misnomer
on
Free For All
·
· Score: 2
There's a bit on the author's website ( http://www.wayner.org/books/ffa/ that addresses that point. He points out that someone has to pay for the paper. Plus, the book is non-fiction so all of the details in it are open-sourced. You can reuse them all you want.
Slashdot Mirror
Still, I think this is better than arranging the book in strict chronological order. It can get downright dull going through 1984, 1985, 1986, etc.
There's a bit on the author's website ( http://www.wayner.org/books/ffa/ that addresses that point. He points out that someone has to pay for the paper. Plus, the book is non-fiction so all of the details in it are open-sourced. You can reuse them all you want.