Advert or not it's still an interesting technology that will have some application even if it doesnt take off as a comsumer technology.
Small buisness cd duplication anyway ?
Thats where I see this getting used, I hate when we receive software from smaller companies on cdr's with the details jotted on with a pen, id rather like to see a "tattooed" label, god knows those stick on label kits are awful.
(sorry if this goes wrong first post) The interesting thing about the issue of url's being property is that it rasies the issue of how the concept of property is defined in the increasingly digital world, property has traditionaly been a physical concept in that it tended to pertain to a physical item however there has always been the 'loop hole' for interlectual property the question then becomes does this 'loop hole' extend to information in the digital age which is far more diverse and also quite repetative in that one person my have the same thing on there page as a thousand other poeple and be totaly oblivious to the fact however if property extends to level of idea and concept in the digital world it would be true to say most of us are both theives and poets. In short in any real sense urls can not be property as they dont have any phycial form to posses however in the context of intelectual property url's are perfectly valid as property. Dang now theres sommin ta tink about.
Slashdot Mirror
Advert or not it's still an interesting technology that will have some application even if it doesnt take off as a comsumer technology.
Small buisness cd duplication anyway ?
Thats where I see this getting used, I hate when we receive software from smaller companies on cdr's with the details jotted on with a pen, id rather like to see a "tattooed" label, god knows those stick on label kits are awful.
(sorry if this goes wrong first post) The interesting thing about the issue of url's being property is that it rasies the issue of how the concept of property is defined in the increasingly digital world, property has traditionaly been a physical concept in that it tended to pertain to a physical item however there has always been the 'loop hole' for interlectual property the question then becomes does this 'loop hole' extend to information in the digital age which is far more diverse and also quite repetative in that one person my have the same thing on there page as a thousand other poeple and be totaly oblivious to the fact however if property extends to level of idea and concept in the digital world it would be true to say most of us are both theives and poets. In short in any real sense urls can not be property as they dont have any phycial form to posses however in the context of intelectual property url's are perfectly valid as property. Dang now theres sommin ta tink about.