If KDE is illegal, then GNOME will have to remove the code taken from KDE (HTML widget), because including illegal code makes the whole library and it's programs illegal, isn't it?
You said KDE may not link to Qt because of their license. They fixed it, now you come up with something different.
What comes next? KDE is illegal because the developers did not name their first born child "Richard Stallmann"?
I think you're trying to destroy one of the best free software projects for your personal fame and interest and i.e. your choice of GNOME. This "forgiveness" phrase is just your next puny attempt to block KDE, and it's obvious other will follow no matter what KDE does
Once you were the respected founder the free software movement, but now you're only a disgrace for the whole community and have lost any respect.
Slashdot Mirror
If KDE is illegal, then GNOME will have to remove the code taken from KDE (HTML widget), because including illegal code makes the whole library and it's programs illegal, isn't it?
You said KDE may not link to Qt because of their license. They fixed it, now you come up with something different. What comes next? KDE is illegal because the developers did not name their first born child "Richard Stallmann"?
I think you're trying to destroy one of the best free software projects for your personal fame and interest and i.e. your choice of GNOME. This "forgiveness" phrase is just your next puny attempt to block KDE, and it's obvious other will follow no matter what KDE does
Once you were the respected founder the free software movement, but now you're only a disgrace for the whole community and have lost any respect.