So if Joe Breacher walks out of the company with a hardware encrypted flash drive, the data is more secure than if he walks out of the company with an unencrypted drive?
What exactly do you mean by trust? Should there be fuses in case the host machine attempts to fry it, or should it run on batteries, or what (the digression into power isn't the point, the fact that trust implies many meanings is the point)?
This implementation was completely borked, but I don't see what problem there is with something like a truecrypt volume on the drive, that the user decrypts using software running on the host computer. That doesn't protect the user from an untrusted machine, but nothing can.
It's terrible. For all the format lock-in and 'do it our way' built into it, Microsoft Reader pretty much blows everything else I have tried out of the water (for reading on a PC).
The, as I call it 'do it our way' is probably responsible for most of what I like about it, of course, it is also probably responsible for most of what I don't like.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm pretty sure this is true for at least the F-117.
I would go so far as to frame it in terms of csv being a convention rather than a format.
Sure seems like there is a fair chance of it.
Doesn't that ruin most drugs?
All you jokers in Florida better hope they aren't working out of North Dakota.
Ah.
Or T-Mobile (they sell a couple of $20 prepaid phones and a few others that are less than $50).
Do you think there is much demand?
I can see business users being interested, but not all that many of them.
He didn't say it would be hard to fix, he said it probably isn't worth spending loads of money on a small problem.
So if Joe Breacher walks out of the company with a hardware encrypted flash drive, the data is more secure than if he walks out of the company with an unencrypted drive?
I don't see it.
The NSA probably wouldn't be quite so blatant.
At least they used an industry standard for the key.
What exactly do you mean by trust? Should there be fuses in case the host machine attempts to fry it, or should it run on batteries, or what (the digression into power isn't the point, the fact that trust implies many meanings is the point)?
This implementation was completely borked, but I don't see what problem there is with something like a truecrypt volume on the drive, that the user decrypts using software running on the host computer. That doesn't protect the user from an untrusted machine, but nothing can.
Phone taps generally require a warrant, and I don't think that police engage in a great deal of home surveillance using helicopters.
Your argument would read better if you just listed the danger inherent in surveillance technology, rather than comparing it to something-go-boom.
They probably also either block visible light, or are not as sensitive to it. And they probably have better sensitivity to thermal signals.
Off is actually equivalent to block but ask. There are some (probably safe) scripted pdfs here if you want to clicky-clicky:
http://www.planetpdf.com/developer/article.asp?ContentID=6828
Cd-rom encyclopedias were replaced by fast enough internet.
It's terrible. For all the format lock-in and 'do it our way' built into it, Microsoft Reader pretty much blows everything else I have tried out of the water (for reading on a PC).
The, as I call it 'do it our way' is probably responsible for most of what I like about it, of course, it is also probably responsible for most of what I don't like.
The Kindle DRM scheme has been broken for months. Publishers don't seem to care (much).
From what I have seen, they often recommend doing heavy processing in a separate thread, to avoid locking up the ui.
How many more top level comments (with next to zero content) are you going to make?
We all get that you love Apple sooooo much.
If it doesn't cause an uproar, who cares?
And I suppose she carries your balls around in her purse?
No. Probably makes it funnier.