Firefox on windows gets far more eyeball time than other platforms, so platform specific bugs tend to get worked out a lot faster. Also, flash support on windows is quite a lot better than linux (or this sure seems to be the case).
That's not the presentation given in the comment I replied to. The implication in that comment is that they would go ahead and do it, why not, not that they would do it for favorable consideration during negotiations.
The post called out the ignorant summary writer in an ignorant fashion. It was begging for a hair splitting correction.
I drink tap water all the time. Hell, I'm not uncomfortable with all the solid human waste that ends up being used as fertilizer. Sometimes, when I'm out in the woods, I take a piss and then eat food without washing my hands (someone I was with called me out on this and I laughed in their face, so "so does everybody else" apparently doesn't apply).
As far as I understand it, you have to pretend that it exists (I would be really surprised if such a feature was quietly rolled out, given that it would be quite the reversal for Taco). I may be wrong, but I haven't seen anything that suggests it is real.
I'm sure it has. The chances of a random person using the latest version of Firefox are mediocre; the chances of a random person using Epiphany are negligible.
Well, how fast were you going? These parts, 10 over is only a couple of points, so to get 16 points, you must have been going ~80 mph. That means you are angry that it took the officer, based on what you say, about 45 seconds to pull you over. Of course, if you were a good way through the mile you are talking about, he had even less time than that.
Sometimes, municipal water can taste funny, and a lot of people have their own wells, so taste can be an issue there as well, but for the most part, water in the U.S. is fantastic.
Draw some boxes. From the point of view of the water, these devices decrease the drop in elevation.
(That is, if a given stretch of river has the effect of adding 1 unit of energy to 1 unit of water, with the devices installed, that same stretch of river will add less than 1 unit of energy to that same unit of water)
If you are in the wrong pool (young, nice car, recent ticket, collision), a ticket can easily add hundreds of dollars to your insurance costs. If you are going to speed anyway, the detector is an investment.
(I don't have any evasion devices and don't make speeding a habit, but I know of other people's experience)
Slashdot Mirror
Firefox on windows gets far more eyeball time than other platforms, so platform specific bugs tend to get worked out a lot faster. Also, flash support on windows is quite a lot better than linux (or this sure seems to be the case).
True enough, but my impression is that most thieves are not yet this sophisticated.
(More, the intent of the feature seems to be disabling access to secure data more than it is theft deterrence)
That's not the presentation given in the comment I replied to. The implication in that comment is that they would go ahead and do it, why not, not that they would do it for favorable consideration during negotiations.
The correctness of the statement varies with the time of day?
The post called out the ignorant summary writer in an ignorant fashion. It was begging for a hair splitting correction.
I drink tap water all the time. Hell, I'm not uncomfortable with all the solid human waste that ends up being used as fertilizer. Sometimes, when I'm out in the woods, I take a piss and then eat food without washing my hands (someone I was with called me out on this and I laughed in their face, so "so does everybody else" apparently doesn't apply).
I thought Starbucks charcoal filtered their coffee.
(for those of you who haven't caught up yet, not the water, the coffee)
Every drop? Prove it.
Take special care with water that has recently fallen from space (ya know, from meteorites).
There is nothing new about people being dishonest.
Yeah, because if corporations are going to be corrupt, they are going to do it in a way that costs them money.
My point was that if the O.P. isn't willing to take such actions, his "I pay taxes because" is empty rhetoric.
Have tried not paying your taxes?
I suspect you pay taxes because your employer takes them out of your paycheck.
It's about punishment.
Still, a simple cost benefit analysis suggests that rehabilitation is a good idea for the ones that you plan on releasing.
Guards don't need to be able to bring their phones into prisoner areas.
As far as I understand it, you have to pretend that it exists (I would be really surprised if such a feature was quietly rolled out, given that it would be quite the reversal for Taco). I may be wrong, but I haven't seen anything that suggests it is real.
You need to assert that you are the leader of the pack.
Like knocking tools out of the astronauts hands.
I imagine the hard part would be making sure that it doesn't do things that are harmful.
So you want to protect all people from all events that may emotionally effect them?
I'm sure it has. The chances of a random person using the latest version of Firefox are mediocre; the chances of a random person using Epiphany are negligible.
Well, how fast were you going? These parts, 10 over is only a couple of points, so to get 16 points, you must have been going ~80 mph. That means you are angry that it took the officer, based on what you say, about 45 seconds to pull you over. Of course, if you were a good way through the mile you are talking about, he had even less time than that.
Fad.
Sometimes, municipal water can taste funny, and a lot of people have their own wells, so taste can be an issue there as well, but for the most part, water in the U.S. is fantastic.
Or they could just store an equivalent mass or volume of water.
Sure, a generator has some advantages over consumables, but I doubt the math works out for a life raft.
You mean "thought of".
Reserving "invented" for things that actually do something will save us all a lot of trouble later.
Draw some boxes. From the point of view of the water, these devices decrease the drop in elevation.
(That is, if a given stretch of river has the effect of adding 1 unit of energy to 1 unit of water, with the devices installed, that same stretch of river will add less than 1 unit of energy to that same unit of water)
If you are in the wrong pool (young, nice car, recent ticket, collision), a ticket can easily add hundreds of dollars to your insurance costs. If you are going to speed anyway, the detector is an investment.
(I don't have any evasion devices and don't make speeding a habit, but I know of other people's experience)