They can build separate buildings with separate labs and separate equipment that all comes from private dollars. It ends up being a pretty severe restriction on who can do the research, but it isn't total.
Does the Netherlands fund their flood control with money from the rest of Europe?
Most people aren't talking about wanting to displace people, they are talking about preferring not to pay them to stay in place. New Orleans is an important port, and it needs to be there; I think you would find that most of the people who posted 'saddening' comments would be perfectly fine with the port taking care of flood control and charging shipping traffic for it.
A lot of federal dollars after Katrina went into buying land and building parks (in areas that are not suitable for housing).
Basically, it is an important port, so there needs to be some sort of city there. Big parts of the city were rebuilt twice in the 20th century, so don't be shocked if it gets rebuilt several times in the next 100 years.
There isn't really any reason to infer anything about the safety of modern food from its kosher status.
(because a beneficial rule of thumb from 2,000 years ago could well be ridiculously strict in the context of modern handling protocols developed from a scientific understanding of disease)
Sure, having a good credit rating makes life a lot simpler. I have a credit card and no plans to get rid of it. But I'm not complaining that credit companies are hassling Discovery. I don't really care. They use simple systems that are cheap and then push costs from poor security to consumers and merchants (I don't like this, but I don't really see that I can do anything about it and thus do nothing, so I am part of the problem). Legislation making the issuer responsible (rather than consumers and merchants) for lines of credit opened under false pretenses and fraudulent charges would fix a lot of the problems (because issuers would suddenly become a lot more willing to spend money on security), but I'm not counting on it.
At the moment, I have a credit union debit card and a credit card that I don't think is RFID (I don't even know for sure, it has some sort of gizmo in it). It isn't really RFID that is the problem (unless you want to narrowly define what RFID is), it is treating semi-private numbers like they are secrets that is the problem; as long as it is possible for issuers to work like this (they make serious money on transaction volume), they will do so.
My point is that principles are not things that are compromised (if you compromise, it wasn't a principle after all) and ranting and raving that someone else should do something is rarely the solution to any problem.
I'm pretty sure it is an accumulative disease, and that the prions are generally concentrated in nervous tissues. One infected cow would lead to a few people having a few molecules introduced into their bodies, but it, if I am understanding things correctly, would not lead to symptomatic CJD.
Eating pork won't give you encephalitis. Eating beef most likely won't give you encephalitis. Crossing a street and taking a shower are probably both things that are more dangerous than eating beef. Eating beef every day.
Prions are nasty shit that we need to figure out how to deal with (they seem to persist even after burning), but your post indicates that you are dramatically overestimating the risk involved with eating tasty hamburgers.
The USDA does not appear to be obstructing those who are offering a method to ensure higher quality, because this action does not involve a method that ensures higher quality.
I think there is a solid 25 years to go, and I wouldn't be surprised to see 50. Mostly because a huge chunk of global economic activity takes place here (and thus attracts other economic activity). Also, all that water is an advantage in a lot of political situations.
Take no responsibility for actions you have no recourse to prevent. If the average American is responsible for any criminal actions of the United States government, so then is the average citizen of the world.
If you were alive during the days that they just burned scientists and heretics at the stake, I am impressed. Perhaps you just mean that you yearn for the days? (this is probably a pretty narrow style issue, but whatever)
If you really care, stop doing business with them. Stop doing business with the various financial companies because they would manipulate what is presented to you. Stop doing business with Discovery because they put profit before whatever-it-is. Stop doing business with people who do business with them. I mean, you don't actually have to sit through the bullshit if you don't want to, but damn if it isn't easier.
What it comes down to is that if you don't stand up for a principle, you don't really have much business expecting anybody else to...
A desktop+Vista+Office is going to last for about 3 years. So over 3 years, you save, say, $1,000 with Linux (this amount is preposterous). Over those same 3 years, if you are lucky, you will have paid the professional office worker about $150,000 in salary (with at least another $50,000 in overhead directly related to employing that person, and probably another $50,000 of overhead that is less directly related).
So the computer costs, maybe, $2,000 over 3 years, and the person costs at least $250,000 over 3 years. The software+computer is a cheap commodity compared to the person. It can still make sense to save money on the software+computer, but the person better not lose even 1% of their productivity.
Carbon coaches would be like life coaches. "Use less fuel." instead of "Go to work everyday." and "Buy the less expensive product." instead of "Don't spend more than your income."
I don't disagree with that, but the fact remains that companies are generally going to store their data where they choose to do business (because doing so only exposes them one set of regulations, and because that set of regulations is increasingly likely to include rules about exporting data), so it shouldn't surprise anyone when the rest of the world, which is a lot larger than the U.S., generates, transmits and stores more data than the U.S. does.
Compared to professional labor working in an office environment, Vista+Office is already a cheap commodity.
Free Software is doomed if it tries to compete on price (widespread perception is that MS Office is the best office software; Microsoft is making enormous profits and could still operate while charging much less); Free Software needs to compete on quality.
Linux on servers, Apache, etc., back up this assertion.
Slashdot Mirror
They can build separate buildings with separate labs and separate equipment that all comes from private dollars. It ends up being a pretty severe restriction on who can do the research, but it isn't total.
So how often do you start smoking (because you seem to have been quitting for just a little while now)?
Does the Netherlands fund their flood control with money from the rest of Europe?
Most people aren't talking about wanting to displace people, they are talking about preferring not to pay them to stay in place. New Orleans is an important port, and it needs to be there; I think you would find that most of the people who posted 'saddening' comments would be perfectly fine with the port taking care of flood control and charging shipping traffic for it.
There are many astonishing things about that statement. This is one of them:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020917-7.html
Link from the summary: http://water.usgs.gov/waterwatch/gustav/
A lot of federal dollars after Katrina went into buying land and building parks (in areas that are not suitable for housing).
Basically, it is an important port, so there needs to be some sort of city there. Big parts of the city were rebuilt twice in the 20th century, so don't be shocked if it gets rebuilt several times in the next 100 years.
O.K., so where are the thousands of cases in Britain?
There isn't really any reason to infer anything about the safety of modern food from its kosher status.
(because a beneficial rule of thumb from 2,000 years ago could well be ridiculously strict in the context of modern handling protocols developed from a scientific understanding of disease)
Sure, having a good credit rating makes life a lot simpler. I have a credit card and no plans to get rid of it. But I'm not complaining that credit companies are hassling Discovery. I don't really care. They use simple systems that are cheap and then push costs from poor security to consumers and merchants (I don't like this, but I don't really see that I can do anything about it and thus do nothing, so I am part of the problem). Legislation making the issuer responsible (rather than consumers and merchants) for lines of credit opened under false pretenses and fraudulent charges would fix a lot of the problems (because issuers would suddenly become a lot more willing to spend money on security), but I'm not counting on it.
At the moment, I have a credit union debit card and a credit card that I don't think is RFID (I don't even know for sure, it has some sort of gizmo in it). It isn't really RFID that is the problem (unless you want to narrowly define what RFID is), it is treating semi-private numbers like they are secrets that is the problem; as long as it is possible for issuers to work like this (they make serious money on transaction volume), they will do so.
My point is that principles are not things that are compromised (if you compromise, it wasn't a principle after all) and ranting and raving that someone else should do something is rarely the solution to any problem.
So where are all the humans with CJD?
I'm pretty sure it is an accumulative disease, and that the prions are generally concentrated in nervous tissues. One infected cow would lead to a few people having a few molecules introduced into their bodies, but it, if I am understanding things correctly, would not lead to symptomatic CJD.
100% what?
Eating pork won't give you encephalitis. Eating beef most likely won't give you encephalitis. Crossing a street and taking a shower are probably both things that are more dangerous than eating beef. Eating beef every day.
Prions are nasty shit that we need to figure out how to deal with (they seem to persist even after burning), but your post indicates that you are dramatically overestimating the risk involved with eating tasty hamburgers.
The USDA does not appear to be obstructing those who are offering a method to ensure higher quality, because this action does not involve a method that ensures higher quality.
I think there is a solid 25 years to go, and I wouldn't be surprised to see 50. Mostly because a huge chunk of global economic activity takes place here (and thus attracts other economic activity). Also, all that water is an advantage in a lot of political situations.
Take no responsibility for actions you have no recourse to prevent. If the average American is responsible for any criminal actions of the United States government, so then is the average citizen of the world.
If you were alive during the days that they just burned scientists and heretics at the stake, I am impressed. Perhaps you just mean that you yearn for the days? (this is probably a pretty narrow style issue, but whatever)
If you really care, stop doing business with them. Stop doing business with the various financial companies because they would manipulate what is presented to you. Stop doing business with Discovery because they put profit before whatever-it-is. Stop doing business with people who do business with them. I mean, you don't actually have to sit through the bullshit if you don't want to, but damn if it isn't easier.
What it comes down to is that if you don't stand up for a principle, you don't really have much business expecting anybody else to...
To help make your rhetoric effective, right english good: YOU MEANT LOSE!
I am sorry to hear that your insurance has run out.
Good or bad, it is likely inevitable:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=948865&cid=24811463
Some cultures discourage the act of having sex with your entire family.
A desktop+Vista+Office is going to last for about 3 years. So over 3 years, you save, say, $1,000 with Linux (this amount is preposterous). Over those same 3 years, if you are lucky, you will have paid the professional office worker about $150,000 in salary (with at least another $50,000 in overhead directly related to employing that person, and probably another $50,000 of overhead that is less directly related).
So the computer costs, maybe, $2,000 over 3 years, and the person costs at least $250,000 over 3 years. The software+computer is a cheap commodity compared to the person. It can still make sense to save money on the software+computer, but the person better not lose even 1% of their productivity.
The historical data is for all plays, not just games, so it is probably possible to account for a lot of that stuff.
Carbon coaches would be like life coaches. "Use less fuel." instead of "Go to work everyday." and "Buy the less expensive product." instead of "Don't spend more than your income."
I don't disagree with that, but the fact remains that companies are generally going to store their data where they choose to do business (because doing so only exposes them one set of regulations, and because that set of regulations is increasingly likely to include rules about exporting data), so it shouldn't surprise anyone when the rest of the world, which is a lot larger than the U.S., generates, transmits and stores more data than the U.S. does.
Compared to professional labor working in an office environment, Vista+Office is already a cheap commodity.
Free Software is doomed if it tries to compete on price (widespread perception is that MS Office is the best office software; Microsoft is making enormous profits and could still operate while charging much less); Free Software needs to compete on quality.
Linux on servers, Apache, etc., back up this assertion.