Slashdot Mirror


User: Dr.+Tom

Dr.+Tom's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
331
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 331

  1. Re:CFCs got hard to obtain on NASA Wants Green Rocket Fuel · · Score: -1, Troll

    ... and the ozone hole is as large today as it ever was ...

  2. How many times do we have to repeat this? on Pink Floyd Engineer Alan Parsons Rips Audiophiles, YouTube and Jonas Brothers · · Score: 0

    It's called the FAR side of the moon. I hate it when people say dark side of the moon.
    /joke

  3. the very first comment on the NY times page on RIAA Chief Whines That SOPA Opponents Were "Unfair" · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Sherman: You made a good point in your conclusion, "we need reason not rhetoric." That's exactly why it was a terrible idea for you to have written this rhetoric-filled inflammatory piece /we're done here

  4. should be public anyway on Cops Set Up Extortion Sting On Symantec's Source Code Thieves · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Security code should be open for review anyway, or it's probably full of bugs and worthless.

  5. rowing the boat on SmartCap Reads Brain Waves to Monitor Workers' Fatigue Levels · · Score: 1

    I think you could do that with a tilt meter. They need those in classrooms, too.

  6. Re:Not news? on FBI Building App To Scrape Social Media · · Score: 1

    yeah, like, derp, everyone can read twitter, or that slashdot site or whatever it's called people who suddenly want to delete their shit because OH NOES THE GOVT CAN SEE IT: I got news for you, they already can We know what their keywords will be: @YourAnonNews #NSA #FBI #CIA #ENCRYPTION #BOMB

  7. mpg on 155 MPH Biofuel Truck Breaks Speed Record · · Score: 1

    MPH is fine but MPG?

  8. Re:/bin, /sbin had their functions on Fedora Aims To Simplify Linux Filesystem · · Score: 1

    most installations ... so you'll break it for the rest and not care? there is value in the separation of function

  9. variability on Droughts Linked To Global Warming · · Score: 0

    What do they mean "natural variability"? 20,000 years ago, New York state was under 2 kilometers of ice. Now that's variability. Seems to me any swing in temp is inside 'natural' variabiliy. I'm just hoping the current warming trend will forestall the next ice age, which would crush society.

  10. what reforestation? on Columbus Blamed For Mini Ice Age · · Score: 1

    When the Europeans got to the new world they cut down more trees than ever! If there had been reforestation, where are those forests?

  11. go on Google Starts to Detail Dart · · Score: 1

    no, seriously, didn't Google just abandon the Go language?

  12. Re:Bad article and summary on Google Starts to Detail Dart · · Score: 1

    funny, I liked the Go language they developed

  13. thrive on Tablet Makers Try To Beat iPad's $500 Pricetag · · Score: 0, Troll

    When I got a Thrive there were the inevitable "Why didn't you get an iPad?" questions. I can program it without paying a fee. It's open source. It's Linux. I can run Python apps. The list goes on and on, but all the people who ask the question don't care at all about any of that. Pity, they should. Top it off: you weenies WISH you had 10 inches.

  14. encryption on Calif. Appeals Court Approves Cell Phone Searches · · Score: 1

    and if the content on your phone is encrypted, can they force you to give up the keys? all because you ran a stop sign this is quite stupid. cops aren't qualified to do computer searches. you can hide stuff on your phone they will never ever find

  15. irrelevant on OCaml For the Masses · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Most of the posts here are missing the point ... Oh wait, this is slashdot. Funny: 5 trumps actually useful information ...

  16. multicore on OCaml For the Masses · · Score: 0

    but can haskell effectively leverage multicore? one school of thought suggests that parallel processing is perfect for non-deterministic functions, which can be trivially implemented in Haskell. But I read that about Prolog. Not Haskell.

  17. Re:Start your party and let democracy decide on Should Science Be King In Politics? · · Score: 1

    hi. that doesn't really mean anything. please try using terms that mean something. 'postmodern' is a wooly bit of fluff, not real meaning

  18. Re:Real security by obscurity on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 1

    How do you know that code they are using is any good? What if some bad guy (or a Russian teenager with nothing better to do) rooted a server somewhere and got the code, and discovered that it's shit? I would seriously be MUCH happier if the missile silos published their code along with proofs that you can't get in. As of now, I assume anybody can get in

  19. Re:SbO: lame on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 1

    seriously, security by obscurity has been show to be stupid many times over. why are we even still talking about this?

  20. Re:SbO: lame on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 1

    you're paranoid

  21. Re:Real security by obscurity on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 1

    You are young. You don't know. Eventually they'll figure out the secret, if it's valuable. Your security is flawless if nobody wants your data. You are a script kiddie. Pro hackers can figure out what OS is being used by the way it responds to packets. The point is that if you are relying on secrets like what OS version you are running, then you lose.

  22. Re:SbO: lame on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 0

    and your credentials are what, internet troll

  23. Re:SbO: lame on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    I've written security code. Have you? Check my slashdot id number. I'm an oldfag. I've been here a LONG time. I know what I'm talking about, and you don't.

  24. Re:I don't think they understood. on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 1

    The key is a secret. If it gets loose you have no security. However, the security protocol (if it is a good one) will allow rekeying; keys are one-time only, and if a key is revealed you can immediately switch to a new key the attacker doesn't know (keys are just random numbers).

  25. Re:SbO: lame on Security By Obscurity — a New Theory · · Score: 0

    derp read wikipedia you are wrong