Your comment cleared up my initial indecision over this case.
The court should obviously rule against the state's attorney in this case, because while kiddie porn is objectionable, it is only legally objectionable because of the damage done to the children involved and not because it "looks" bad.
Whoever cooks that shit up, though, deserves a kick in the balls.
Um, I disagree. The apathy of the unlearned or too content masses gives my vote more power, and I _do_ care. If there are only 5 registered voters, and only me and another guy vote, I count for half the voters in the country. So I say to the misguided "Get Out The Vote" campaigns, "Pshaw!"
I don't like Bush, and I don't like Gore, but I really don't like Bush. No princes!
Slashdot Mirror
The court should obviously rule against the state's attorney in this case, because while kiddie porn is objectionable, it is only legally objectionable because of the damage done to the children involved and not because it "looks" bad.
Whoever cooks that shit up, though, deserves a kick in the balls.
Um, I disagree. The apathy of the unlearned or too content masses gives my vote more power, and I _do_ care. If there are only 5 registered voters, and only me and another guy vote, I count for half the voters in the country. So I say to the misguided "Get Out The Vote" campaigns, "Pshaw!" I don't like Bush, and I don't like Gore, but I really don't like Bush. No princes!