Science is not reality. Science is an attempt to get close to a working model of reality. Science can never find Truth, but science fanboi's BELIEVE it does. At any given time, close to half of what science has discovered is false, it just hasn't been falsified yet. Then again, you appear to be a science fanboi so being the religious nutter you are, nothing will change your BELIEF.
Similiar? Like how the canadians can launch 3.5x the satellites? Or that there are 10x more? Or how O3B is at an orbit 5x higher? Or how the canadians have more coverage and lower latency?
Do you know of any other country where government officials divide the world with their US and THEM rhetoric? Not sure if you've noticed, there is no other country that is so divided on almost every single issue. It's hard to notice this if you live in the middle of the propaganda, it really seems like USians believe the rest of the world is exactly as paranoid and fearful of any beliefs unlike their own.
Not sure why that confuses everyone. It's almost like idiots who say that would die of starvation if they went to a non-english speaking country and couldn't find food labelled in english.
God is the superset of everything, a rose by any other name...
No, physics agrees with me. Unsustainability is unsustainable. Logically we should do something about it before it literally comes to kill or be killed. Figuratively, we are already there as the wealthy nations strip the poorer ones of their resources.
It's stupidity like yours which defines the US. Always US and THEM.
One day, hopefully before it's too late, you dimwits will realize there's this other option called WE. We are all humans. Once you get used to the fact that killing/supressing/enslaving/opressing others to support an unsustainable lifestyle is unsustainable, maybe we can make real inroads into sustainability and cooperation.
umm, you do realize that the US government thinks it'll actually benefit the economy right? That's why they started ramping up propaganda against China in the past couple of years.
You can't change a deaf man's beliefs through a lecture. It's not my job to do other people's thinking for them, nor is this the appropriate forum for proofs.
Sometimes, I sprinkle some truth around to see if there are any fertile minds around in the sea of sheeple, as a sort of crude gauge as to when all this stupid destructiveness of man and earth in the name of money will end.
So, umm, you didn't look up the trend through the 20th century. Perhaps I'm not trendy enough, but trend used to mean a pattern over time, not so much a pattern across space.
I don't digest propaganda, it gives me indigestion.
Have you ever considered the possibility I sound like an idiot precisely because I did not digest the prevaling propaganda?
Look, I know you're probably american, so you're probably regularly exposed to those two groups of sheeple incapable of independent thought: the religious fanatic and the science fanboi. In fact, you might even be a science fanboi since their most common tactic in defense of their beliefs is to stretch what a person says to illogical extremes.
haha, what an idiot doesn't he know everything is a chemical. What an idiot, doesn't he know arsenic is natural.
I'm not one of them. Neither will I do your thinking for you.
It's funny how you can offer people health and they just sneer at your stupidity:)
The sad thing is, that pretty much sums up all western medicine. It's a three shell game of hide the symptom.
It's a little understandable. Most people were too ignorant to understand proper care of their bodies and dissemination of information wasn't the greatest. Unfortunately, we've almost painted ourselves into a corner now through all that coddling and pill giving, almost actively encouraging indulgence in harmful behaviours. Now, when we can disseminate the information easily, it's almost impossible to put into practice because we've almost destroyed any possibility of a healthy food supply for the average person.
Tell me, how do you get flexible lipid barriers when you only consume inflexible lipids? Did you know street sweepers can only get in there to clean up the small stuff when you have an unburdened garbage disposal system to pick up the big trash? Do you have any clue what the difference between a mechanism and a cause is? Difference between a symptom and a cause? Eating a proper diet of pesticide/herbicide/antibiotic/hormone laden foods isn't going to get you anywhere.
If you belong to the small percentage of people who can't process those and your body warns you by perceiving them as having a horrible taste and odor, then yes avoid them. Generally good to avoid celery due to it's high level of pesticide residue though.
Though in general, sulfur smells aren't my idea of toxic spill smells, more just like a round trip to hell.
Nice made up false dichotomy. btw, hardly anybody dies at age 30 of cholera or malnutrition in any country, and life expectancy is a lot higher in Uganda.
However, I would prefer to grow and cook my own food and die by any unintentional mistake than to die slowly by overtaxing my waste disposal systems by the intentional addition of non-natural ingredients solely for the sake of increasing a companies bottom line.
Byproducts. Just because you can't comprehend how that explains clearly doesn't mean I'm the idiot. Most non-idiots understand that the general term 'chemicals' refers to human produced chemicals and not naturally occuring ones, but nice science fanboi strawman there. If you think that man made chemicals have the same properties as their natural counterparts you obviously don't know your american history very well.
Capitalism demands that a company be as profitable as possible. Flouride led the way to show that it is more profitable to sell toxic byproducts as additives than to pay to dispose of them. Do you know how many GMO corn byproducts are disposed of in US 'food' items? It's ok, keep drinking the kool-aid and loading up on twinkies, it's not my body. I just hope the US destroys itself through stupidity before it causes irreparable damage to the world food system.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic. But here goes.
Prosciutto only contains NaCl salt. Salt causing heart disease is not scientifically proven, it has been inferred by a simplistic model and not really corroborated by any evidence. When referering to sodium in products, most is not in the form of NaCl, but as nitrate, nitrite, erthyrobate, etc... , these are the forms that make your BO stink to high heaven to breakdown and get rid of. A pretty good rule of thumb is anything that you eat that makes you stink like a toxic chemical spill should probably be avoided in the future.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you're confusing 'critical of authority' with an 'I know better than you attitude', you know, like practically every single post on slashdot.
Science is not reality. Science is an attempt to get close to a working model of reality. Science can never find Truth, but science fanboi's BELIEVE it does. At any given time, close to half of what science has discovered is false, it just hasn't been falsified yet. Then again, you appear to be a science fanboi so being the religious nutter you are, nothing will change your BELIEF.
Or, wait, now I get it. Satellites right?
Do you know of any other country where government officials divide the world with their US and THEM rhetoric? Not sure if you've noticed, there is no other country that is so divided on almost every single issue. It's hard to notice this if you live in the middle of the propaganda, it really seems like USians believe the rest of the world is exactly as paranoid and fearful of any beliefs unlike their own.
God is the superset of everything, a rose by any other name...
is that Sascha Segan is a douche who can't comprehend the difference between a device at $100 and others at $500-$700.
Why would a browser be an operating system?
oh, that's rich. Apparently you're not aware of how the US does business with those it considers it's friends and allies!
when can I use it to run emacs?
No, physics agrees with me. Unsustainability is unsustainable. Logically we should do something about it before it literally comes to kill or be killed. Figuratively, we are already there as the wealthy nations strip the poorer ones of their resources.
haha, true. I couldn't think of a way to properly express the superset of US and THEM in english. Not sure there is a word except God.
Recognising differences is hardwired, it's how we tell things apart. Treating others differently is all software.
One day, hopefully before it's too late, you dimwits will realize there's this other option called WE. We are all humans. Once you get used to the fact that killing/supressing/enslaving/opressing others to support an unsustainable lifestyle is unsustainable, maybe we can make real inroads into sustainability and cooperation.
umm, you do realize that the US government thinks it'll actually benefit the economy right? That's why they started ramping up propaganda against China in the past couple of years.
Sometimes, I sprinkle some truth around to see if there are any fertile minds around in the sea of sheeple, as a sort of crude gauge as to when all this stupid destructiveness of man and earth in the name of money will end.
I'll tell you again, as an autist, I don't do well with propaganda nor authority. I do very well with hard science though.
So, umm, you didn't look up the trend through the 20th century. Perhaps I'm not trendy enough, but trend used to mean a pattern over time, not so much a pattern across space.
Have you ever considered the possibility I sound like an idiot precisely because I did not digest the prevaling propaganda?
Look, I know you're probably american, so you're probably regularly exposed to those two groups of sheeple incapable of independent thought: the religious fanatic and the science fanboi. In fact, you might even be a science fanboi since their most common tactic in defense of their beliefs is to stretch what a person says to illogical extremes.
haha, what an idiot doesn't he know everything is a chemical. What an idiot, doesn't he know arsenic is natural.
I'm not one of them. Neither will I do your thinking for you.
It's funny how you can offer people health and they just sneer at your stupidity :)
It's a little understandable. Most people were too ignorant to understand proper care of their bodies and dissemination of information wasn't the greatest. Unfortunately, we've almost painted ourselves into a corner now through all that coddling and pill giving, almost actively encouraging indulgence in harmful behaviours. Now, when we can disseminate the information easily, it's almost impossible to put into practice because we've almost destroyed any possibility of a healthy food supply for the average person.
I see your stupid anecdote and will raise with the people of the caucasus mountains. Call.
Tell me, how do you get flexible lipid barriers when you only consume inflexible lipids? Did you know street sweepers can only get in there to clean up the small stuff when you have an unburdened garbage disposal system to pick up the big trash? Do you have any clue what the difference between a mechanism and a cause is? Difference between a symptom and a cause? Eating a proper diet of pesticide/herbicide/antibiotic/hormone laden foods isn't going to get you anywhere.
Though in general, sulfur smells aren't my idea of toxic spill smells, more just like a round trip to hell.
However, I would prefer to grow and cook my own food and die by any unintentional mistake than to die slowly by overtaxing my waste disposal systems by the intentional addition of non-natural ingredients solely for the sake of increasing a companies bottom line.
Byproducts. Just because you can't comprehend how that explains clearly doesn't mean I'm the idiot. Most non-idiots understand that the general term 'chemicals' refers to human produced chemicals and not naturally occuring ones, but nice science fanboi strawman there. If you think that man made chemicals have the same properties as their natural counterparts you obviously don't know your american history very well. Capitalism demands that a company be as profitable as possible. Flouride led the way to show that it is more profitable to sell toxic byproducts as additives than to pay to dispose of them. Do you know how many GMO corn byproducts are disposed of in US 'food' items? It's ok, keep drinking the kool-aid and loading up on twinkies, it's not my body. I just hope the US destroys itself through stupidity before it causes irreparable damage to the world food system.
Prosciutto only contains NaCl salt. Salt causing heart disease is not scientifically proven, it has been inferred by a simplistic model and not really corroborated by any evidence. When referering to sodium in products, most is not in the form of NaCl, but as nitrate, nitrite, erthyrobate, etc... , these are the forms that make your BO stink to high heaven to breakdown and get rid of. A pretty good rule of thumb is anything that you eat that makes you stink like a toxic chemical spill should probably be avoided in the future.