Not as interesting? Lucidity is separate from control. Control in the hypnogogic state can be as boring as your imagination. Lucidity in deep rem is anything but un-interesting though requires extreme emotional control to maintain
Lucidity at night is directly correlated to awareness during the day.
Perhaps you should stop thinking, doesn't seem to be working out for you. Fibe doesn't over-report and you can get a breakdown of usage to easily compare with your logs.
Try not to use "seen" for hearsay, it's not appropriate.
Thanks. I sometimes find that a well used ad hominem will separate the wheat from the chaff. Propaganda babies get angry, logical rational people re-assess.
...and son(so unless your going to argue that a 16 year old boy from Denver is a senior operational leader with AQ we already know that killings occur when even the low bar set by this whitepaper is not met), was part of a co-belligerent force, not AQ.
I would never argue that. I think the US' foreign policy is deplorable and their post-facto rationalizations and this memo a bit idiotic and paranoid. Just pointing out logical flaws people make in a futile attempt to stem the tide of stupidity. I sometimes wonder what real change could occur if people channeled all their energy into the real issues instead of getting lost in divisive political spin.
As an aside, it's not unheard of a ministers son to continue in his father's footsteps. Nor can we logically conclude what factors an irrational organization would use to promote leaders. It may in fact just be the capacity to preach hatred against other ways.
It sucks and apparently everybody but the designers think so. I wonder if the downfall of slashdot was when they started trying to run it like a business. Managers and designers that know nothing about their audience or apparently don't care. Though it makes sense to build an audience of idiots because idiots buy things. Nerds and geeks will roll their own.
I really wish slashdot had an api to access posts so we could calculate the exact turning point. Definitely 2013 is when the tide has shifted.
simpler to understand for simple people with an oral tradition. Try playing telephone with germ theory.
Do you trust your 5 year old to wash his hands properly? We have bacterial soap(a modern stupidity) what did they have? Sure their fat offerings would end up with soap but did they use it?
How long did it take modern humans to not think believing in tiny invisible things that make you sick is looney? Do you know how many people still don't believe in germs? Stop using your modern viewpoint to judge past viewpoints, it doesn't work.
Holy crap do they not teach you guys reading comprehension in school or what?
Yes I'm disputing the whole we can judge you a member arbitrarily because it doesn't say that in the memo. The whole memo only applies when 3 conditions are met. One of those being that the person is a high ranking official in al-Qa'ida. The memo only explains the rational when those conditions are met, it does not deal with how.those conditions are met.
Let me repeat it again. High ranking al-qa'ida.
If you wanted to argue anything there is one part of the memo that appears poorly written and doesn't mention al-qa'ida. Given USian logic it could almost be predicted that in the future that one sentence could be used as an opening to include other groups.
seriuosly though, take some online reading comprehension courses since you did not understand the memo or my parent post.
No. No it doesn't. Try again. How about quoting the memo. You can't because it doesn't say that.
The ONLY judgment call is whether a high level al-Qa'ida member poses an imminent threat. If you want to get upset about something get upset about that. It's even what the summary refers to. Read the part where it says al-qa'ida is deemed to always be plotting and therefore there is always an imminent threat. So basically carte-blanche to kill US citizens that are part of al-qa'ida... outside of the US.
um, simplified from battle? You know, where people can attack you from all sides and not just poke at you from the front.
Once you are proficient, i.e., deep understanding not just able to use the tools, in both math and physical skills you can easily see the connection. Symbollism is just one form of mathematic expression.
That is pure speculation based on a non-logical inference. The memo doesn't say that and that shouldn't be suprising since they are two seperate issues.
Slashdot Mirror
Right, because there's no choice of protein between cow and soy.
If the US was intelligent at all, they would just eliminate cow from their diet. Healthier people, cleaner water, more arable land, less GGE.
Lucidity at night is directly correlated to awareness during the day.
I'm actually serious.
Sounds like a few of the organic delivery services I've used in Canada.
Try not to use "seen" for hearsay, it's not appropriate.
I sincerely encourage you to sue them so that you can pay more.
I guess it really doesn't take any facts for the idiots to start clamoring about how all business' are evil.
Yes, because by under-reporting they can charge you ...wait you're just one of those idiots that doesn't RTFA right?
Great now everybody knows the reason for my big mouth and ass!
Yes people let us live in fear. Fear the bogeyman. Hide your truth. Isn't it obvious this is the path to a brighter future.
You aren't asking a question when you assume the answer and proceed to rant about it.
in Canada seems to be where the problems would stem from. Would it be considered in 'my' best interests to install software to incriminate myself?
Nice to see the ad hominems though.
Thanks. I sometimes find that a well used ad hominem will separate the wheat from the chaff. Propaganda babies get angry, logical rational people re-assess.
I would never argue that. I think the US' foreign policy is deplorable and their post-facto rationalizations and this memo a bit idiotic and paranoid. Just pointing out logical flaws people make in a futile attempt to stem the tide of stupidity. I sometimes wonder what real change could occur if people channeled all their energy into the real issues instead of getting lost in divisive political spin.
As an aside, it's not unheard of a ministers son to continue in his father's footsteps. Nor can we logically conclude what factors an irrational organization would use to promote leaders. It may in fact just be the capacity to preach hatred against other ways.
um, missing from their website, where else?
I really wish slashdot had an api to access posts so we could calculate the exact turning point. Definitely 2013 is when the tide has shifted.
Do you trust your 5 year old to wash his hands properly? We have bacterial soap(a modern stupidity) what did they have? Sure their fat offerings would end up with soap but did they use it?
How long did it take modern humans to not think believing in tiny invisible things that make you sick is looney? Do you know how many people still don't believe in germs? Stop using your modern viewpoint to judge past viewpoints, it doesn't work.
And how do you know they are high ranking al Quaeda operatives? Because Obama says so?
Citation for your political rant?
Yes I'm disputing the whole we can judge you a member arbitrarily because it doesn't say that in the memo. The whole memo only applies when 3 conditions are met. One of those being that the person is a high ranking official in al-Qa'ida. The memo only explains the rational when those conditions are met, it does not deal with how.those conditions are met.
Let me repeat it again. High ranking al-qa'ida.
If you wanted to argue anything there is one part of the memo that appears poorly written and doesn't mention al-qa'ida. Given USian logic it could almost be predicted that in the future that one sentence could be used as an opening to include other groups.
seriuosly though, take some online reading comprehension courses since you did not understand the memo or my parent post.
As an aside, pretty much all offerings to god would end up with soap.
The ONLY judgment call is whether a high level al-Qa'ida member poses an imminent threat. If you want to get upset about something get upset about that. It's even what the summary refers to. Read the part where it says al-qa'ida is deemed to always be plotting and therefore there is always an imminent threat. So basically carte-blanche to kill US citizens that are part of al-qa'ida... outside of the US.
Once you are proficient, i.e., deep understanding not just able to use the tools, in both math and physical skills you can easily see the connection. Symbollism is just one form of mathematic expression.
No, people are conflating the two to get people pissed. You new to politics or something?
I'm sure even the USians will enjoy more and more copyright owners getting sued by themselves.
That is pure speculation based on a non-logical inference. The memo doesn't say that and that shouldn't be suprising since they are two seperate issues.