Omoshiroi ya nen
I still miss the days of Cyrix/IBM. Those were fast. I don't know why they couldn't make a go of it, when AMD had about the same price/performance up till a few years ago.
Cyrix had a great core. The instructions were handled very well. Even though the true MHz was not the PR rating, they were fast. They overclocked very nicely.
Re:You really need to stop linking people have lyn
on
Pentium 4 Delayed
·
· Score: 1
Why did you post your code? Should we care?
Also, why don't you get a browser.
Actually,
Anyone know the MIPS/Gigaflop capacity for the 1GHz PIII? A physics prof was going on about the.5 MIP speed of the Central System we are phasing out. We got into a discussion of MIPS, and what a MIP really means! Is there an equation for the ration between MHz and MIPS?
What about Gigaflops? How does SHNapple come up with their arguments that 2G3's are faster than the PIII?
Slashdot Mirror
The MX chips were great. Ran software fine. Chipsets integrated well with it too. Too bad they belong to VIA now
Omoshiroi ya nen I still miss the days of Cyrix/IBM. Those were fast. I don't know why they couldn't make a go of it, when AMD had about the same price/performance up till a few years ago. Cyrix had a great core. The instructions were handled very well. Even though the true MHz was not the PR rating, they were fast. They overclocked very nicely.
Why did you post your code? Should we care? Also, why don't you get a browser.
Actually, Anyone know the MIPS/Gigaflop capacity for the 1GHz PIII? A physics prof was going on about the .5 MIP speed of the Central System we are phasing out. We got into a discussion of MIPS, and what a MIP really means! Is there an equation for the ration between MHz and MIPS?
What about Gigaflops? How does SHNapple come up with their arguments that 2G3's are faster than the PIII?