That's what I did. In about 3-5 years, India is going to have the infrastructure to OWN the software industry. Their resources are comparable only to China(who is also coming on very strong). There is lots of opportunity here for any enterprising young programmer. The only problem is the Rupee-Dollar exchange rate. A person with lots of debt or student loans would never be able to pay them off on India salary. However, there are many Indian software development companies who are itching to get a few good "western" developers over here.
Other than the spicy food, I'm having a great time over here.
Hey..there is one of you out there...
on
Top of the Crops 2002
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Finally. Some sense. Thank you for explaining to these freekin idiots.
Its simple folks. Lots of them are created by humans. No doubt. Lots of them cannot possibly be created by humans alone. They are too precise and carry too much meaning.
I have been studying crop circles for a while and have read lots of information.
Did you know that..
1.) Even though very very precise, the shapes are not perfect. For instance, if there is a shape of a circle, it will not be perfectly round. It will have measurements similar to what a perfect circle would look like if it were projected DOWN on the surface of the earth from about 200 miles up in the air. Sorry, I couldn't find a link for this information, it came out of my books. Don't ask me how they do the math to arrive at this conclusion, its way beyond me.
2.) The ground under the plants which have been flattened in the geometries contains traces of chemicals and compounds which indicate extreme heat. The ground right next to it, under stalks which have not been bent or flattened looks perfectly normal. Go Here and here.
3.) There was one or more formations in which a porcupine was found in the very center, flattened and dead. Its Quills were arranged in the same spiral pattern as the circle. Go Here.
4.) in 2001, a formation appeared near a radio telescope. In 1974, Carl Sagan and some other folks transitted a message out into space. The formation appears to be a reply. go Go Here and here.
5.) The formations themselves contain information in the order in which they are created and their location. Much study has been done on their relevance to each other by their physical location. No links to this that I am aware of.
There are tons and tons of little stories like that that individually don't mean much. However, taken together, paint a pretty different picture.
Its very sad that so many of you/.'ers are so quick to spout drivel and trash without first exploring a little bit.
Much of this information isn't on the Net. It is however, published in a number of books.
A very good one is by a fellow named Freddy Silva, its called "Secrets In The Fields". Its clear that he has an axe to grind, but you cannot discount the information in it.
Lets get these clowns(media companies) to sue themselves because they actually provide the material to be pirated. If they never provided the material, then it wouldn't be possible to priate it. So they are actually at fault.
That's what I did. In about 3-5 years, India is going to have the infrastructure to OWN the software industry. Their resources are comparable only to China(who is also coming on very strong). There is lots of opportunity here for any enterprising young programmer. The only problem is the Rupee-Dollar exchange rate. A person with lots of debt or student loans would never be able to pay them off on India salary. However, there are many Indian software development companies who are itching to get a few good "western" developers over here.
Other than the spicy food, I'm having a great time over here.
Finally. Some sense. Thank you for explaining to these freekin idiots.
/.'ers are so quick to spout drivel and trash without first exploring a little bit.
Its simple folks. Lots of them are created by humans. No doubt. Lots of them cannot possibly be created by humans alone. They are too precise and carry too much meaning.
I have been studying crop circles for a while and have read lots of information.
Did you know that..
1.) Even though very very precise, the shapes are not perfect. For instance, if there is a shape of a circle, it will not be perfectly round. It will have measurements similar to what a perfect circle would look like if it were projected DOWN on the surface of the earth from about 200 miles up in the air. Sorry, I couldn't find a link for this information, it came out of my books. Don't ask me how they do the math to arrive at this conclusion, its way beyond me.
2.) The ground under the plants which have been flattened in the geometries contains traces of chemicals and compounds which indicate extreme heat. The ground right next to it, under stalks which have not been bent or flattened looks perfectly normal. Go Here and here.
3.) There was one or more formations in which a porcupine was found in the very center, flattened and dead. Its Quills were arranged in the same spiral pattern as the circle. Go Here.
4.) in 2001, a formation appeared near a radio telescope. In 1974, Carl Sagan and some other folks transitted a message out into space. The formation appears to be a reply. go Go Here and here.
5.) The formations themselves contain information in the order in which they are created and their location. Much study has been done on their relevance to each other by their physical location. No links to this that I am aware of.
There are tons and tons of little stories like that that individually don't mean much. However, taken together, paint a pretty different picture.
Its very sad that so many of you
Much of this information isn't on the Net. It is however, published in a number of books.
A very good one is by a fellow named Freddy Silva, its called "Secrets In The Fields". Its clear that he has an axe to grind, but you cannot discount the information in it.
Paul Vigay has a good site Here
I believe that something is going on here which needs further research.
Open up your minds folks. We ain't in the dark ages anymore.
Hmm...
Lets get these clowns(media companies) to sue themselves because they actually provide the material to be pirated. If they never provided the material, then it wouldn't be possible to priate it. So they are actually at fault.