Schools (or anyone else for that matter) could install as many copies of RedHat as they wanted without paying anything, as long as they were not expecting free support.
How is the 'new' situation different? How do schools benefit from this? Are RHAT simply trying to obscure the implications of the GPL and make people think they have to pay for something they don't?
And why are we giving free publicity to clueless marketroids who should know better?
Slashdot Mirror
The person who wrote
DID YOU KNOW that Windows 2000 may crash non-Microsoft DNS servers? should be larted.
I hate how MS has "embraced & extended" DNS, but
the fact that BIND dumps core when updated by W2K clients is BIND's problem, not Microsoft's!
Schools (or anyone else for that matter) could install as many copies of RedHat as they wanted without paying anything, as long as they were not expecting free support.
How is the 'new' situation different? How do schools benefit from this? Are RHAT simply trying to obscure the implications of the GPL and make people think they have to pay for something they don't?
And why are we giving free publicity to clueless marketroids who should know better?