The hot-depoy/redeploy feature alone is enough to sway me to use JBoss/Jetty or JBoss/Tomcat over plain Jane Tomcat. This is simply one of the most useful development-time features for J2EE programming (with or without EJBs). Our consulting company brought in Scott Stark from JBoss Group for a week long intensive training on the JBoss 3.0 internals. Very good, very technical information on the architecture and design of JBoss 3.0. Well worth the money spent on the course. If you have not used JBoss yet, you owe it to yourself to try this app server out.
Re:Microsoft's Choice of Protocols for .NET
on
HTTP's Days Numbered
·
· Score: 1
Don Box had a major hand in coming up with the SOAP protocol (http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/). He just recently joined MS. More info at http://www.donbox.com/rumors2.htm. I've seen him bashing on SOAP as of late, which I find somewhat interesting.
> My only fear about.Net on Linux is that
> whoever ends up implementing.Net on Linux will
> probably not be too Linux-friendly
Isn't this where the Corel/MS connection comes in? I heard a while ago that MS's infusion of cash into Corel was to help MS port this.NET thingy over to Linux. Not sure where this will all go (anyone using DCOM on Unix these days? Nope, I didn't think so). I see.NET as appealing to the MS shops out there; as a Java consultant working with J2EE solutions (iPlanet AS 6.0 and Sybase EAServer), there is no drought of work to be done. I guess I can get excited when the CLR runs on Solaris; until then, I'll keep plodding along nicely with J2EE.
The hot-depoy/redeploy feature alone is enough to sway me to use JBoss/Jetty or JBoss/Tomcat over plain Jane Tomcat. This is simply one of the most useful development-time features for J2EE programming (with or without EJBs). Our consulting company brought in Scott Stark from JBoss Group for a week long intensive training on the JBoss 3.0 internals. Very good, very technical information on the architecture and design of JBoss 3.0. Well worth the money spent on the course. If you have not used JBoss yet, you owe it to yourself to try this app server out.
Don Box had a major hand in coming up with the SOAP protocol (http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/). He just recently joined MS. More info at http://www.donbox.com/rumors2.htm. I've seen him bashing on SOAP as of late, which I find somewhat interesting.
-- chris --
> My only fear about .Net on Linux is that .Net on Linux will
.NET thingy over to Linux. Not sure where this will all go (anyone using DCOM on Unix these days? Nope, I didn't think so). I see .NET as appealing to the MS shops out there; as a Java consultant working with J2EE solutions (iPlanet AS 6.0 and Sybase EAServer), there is no drought of work to be done. I guess I can get excited when the CLR runs on Solaris; until then, I'll keep plodding along nicely with J2EE.
> whoever ends up implementing
> probably not be too Linux-friendly
Isn't this where the Corel/MS connection comes in? I heard a while ago that MS's infusion of cash into Corel was to help MS port this