While I agree with you on principle, I think that this article would be much better written without your "I hate that guy and I'm gonna trash him" shades on. Your facts are very skewed. Offering "Violent crimes commited by students" for one year and "Violent crimes not resulting in death by students" for the next. That may just have been a small typo, but it looks very sneaky and unreliable. If you wish to fight fro my cause, I wish for you to have a rock solid foundation and be able to withstand scrutiny.
I encourage you to go to www.killology.com and read through some of the stuff there (without your fingers in your ears going "NaNaNaNaNa I'm not listening!"). I don't support everything that the man says, but there are several points on which he is just right. And you have to admit your opponents strengths before you can attack his weaknesses. Right is right no matter where it comes from.
Slashdot Mirror
^ This guy votes.....Shouldn't you?
While I agree with you on principle, I think that this article would be much better written without your "I hate that guy and I'm gonna trash him" shades on. Your facts are very skewed. Offering "Violent crimes commited by students" for one year and "Violent crimes not resulting in death by students" for the next. That may just have been a small typo, but it looks very sneaky and unreliable. If you wish to fight fro my cause, I wish for you to have a rock solid foundation and be able to withstand scrutiny. I encourage you to go to www.killology.com and read through some of the stuff there (without your fingers in your ears going "NaNaNaNaNa I'm not listening!"). I don't support everything that the man says, but there are several points on which he is just right. And you have to admit your opponents strengths before you can attack his weaknesses. Right is right no matter where it comes from.