The fundamental problem is that Wikipedia's governance structure has no meaningful mechanisms for self-correction. In one sense, it is being run by a Congress where members are selected for life, and control the selection of their colleagues. In another, it is run by the online equivalent of Afghan warlords. Wikipedia seems to combine the less attractive aspects of both metaphors.
Your page was removed because it was targeted by a notorious online troll, who for some reason is protected by Wikipedia's administrators. The troll believes that no one he is not fond of should be allowed to post anything on Wikipedia that reflects favorably on themselves. Interestingly, he uses Wikipedia "commons" to store his collection of personal photos, and promotes his favorites on his own user page.
Slashdot Mirror
The fundamental problem is that Wikipedia's governance structure has no meaningful mechanisms for self-correction. In one sense, it is being run by a Congress where members are selected for life, and control the selection of their colleagues. In another, it is run by the online equivalent of Afghan warlords. Wikipedia seems to combine the less attractive aspects of both metaphors.
Your page was removed because it was targeted by a notorious online troll, who for some reason is protected by Wikipedia's administrators. The troll believes that no one he is not fond of should be allowed to post anything on Wikipedia that reflects favorably on themselves. Interestingly, he uses Wikipedia "commons" to store his collection of personal photos, and promotes his favorites on his own user page.