----- TibbonZero wrote: Instead, couldn't have they just called it a Beta or put a disclaimer on the page (or in the EULA?...) -----
Hmmm, If Bcast2000 was distributed under the GPL, then there's a "No Warranty" clause already a part of the licence, which says that the developer is not responsble for any damages, losses, etc. you incur as a result of using the software. Of course, that's assuming it was distributed under the GPL...
Slashdot Mirror
Hi!
-----
TibbonZero wrote:
Instead, couldn't have they just called it a Beta or put a disclaimer on the page (or in the EULA?...)
-----
Hmmm, If Bcast2000 was distributed under the GPL, then there's a "No Warranty" clause already a part of the licence, which says that the developer is not responsble for any damages, losses, etc. you incur as a result of using the software. Of course, that's assuming it was distributed under the GPL...