No it's not. If you want the full functionality of NFS4+Kerberos, you need to set up your Samba server as a full Domain Member server in an Active Directory domain, which is quite a task in itself.
Oh dear. You are not just a libertard, you are an illiterate as well. I claimed no such thing; I claimed a post office with universal service had the non-monetary benefit of supporting the legal system; you do realise why it is that mailing a legal document is considered the same as presenting it in person, don't you?
And your second point remains a stupid logical fallacy, so I'm not bothering to answer that. And since you're too stupid to see why that is, you've earned the epithet 'libertard'.
Your last post contained a non-sequitur and a logical fallacy so immediately obvious that the only thing I get from it is that you are almost as bad a libertard as roman_mir.
No, that's common Libertard dogma you're spouting.
Society has more than a monetary benefit from a working post office with universal service. As an example, it enables the smooth functioning of the courts, by being a universal carrier for legal documents.
If you really think that all benefits from a public service can be accounted for in cash, then that serves only as proof that you're a basement-dwelling teenager with walls full of Ayn Rand posters.
You don't even have to go into detail. 'Salvation by faith alone' is a Protestant doctrine, not supported by the Catholic church. That gives you about, what? 50% of all Christians?
And bugger all, I made a mistake here. 1 liter is 1 dm3, not one 1m3. OK, you may have a point, that's a bit silly at first sight. The conversion is still simple, but your point stands.
So, how many cubic meters in a liter (in your head, please, and quickly)? How many grams of water in a cubic meter of water? And why aren't either of these 1?
1 and 1000 respectively. So where you get your 'either of these' is a riddle to me.
As to why 1000 grams, that's because the SI unit of weight is the kilogram, and what do you know, one liter of water is 1 kilogram.
Exactly. Stripped of its scientific political correctness, all this study does is say that (American) boys are raised to be aggressive, disruptive little assholes.
The misogynistic ranting on this discussion seems to confirm that observation.
One minute of Googling gave me the answer that you set this in your default mime settings, in.local/share/applications/default.list and.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list
Now, this is rather arcane I admit, but that was not my argument. My argument is that anything beyond daily operation (and changing the default file manager is beyond that) requires specialist knowledge, but the Windows fanbois always pretend that this is not true while slagging off Linux.
Of course I was merely joking. I find it rather typical that you seem to take it as an attack of sorts.
And yet the common argument in favour of Windows is that it is so easy to administer; so easy in fact that administrators are easier to come by than *nix admins.
The problem is not that Mauro screwed up. The problem is that he made excuses and blamed someone else for his screw-up. That is flat-out unacceptable in a professional situation.
Focusing on the tone of Linus' argument is missing the point. Linus is right here.
Let me add a note for the community: yes, they are almost as bad as Apple fanbois when it comes to advocating Ada, but aside from that it's the friendliest community I've ever met on the Internet.
When I as a hobbyist, who dabbles a bit in Ada, can ask questions and get answers from professional industrial programmers with multiple large mission-critical systems to their name, and get these answers in a friendly supportive tone, I think I am justified to say that this is a nice community.
Contrary to what people tell you, it is not a complex language at all, it's a fairly standard Algol descendant. It does have an intricate type system that you must get used to to get anything done, and it is a bit wordy, using actual words as identifiers for everything except for some operators, but aside from that it's a very elegant language, and surprisingly fun to work with.
You really should think things through before posting.
The theory you are defending states that a tax increase on businesses will be discounted immediately in prices. I'm simply saying that elementary economics says that if such a potential increase could be discounted without loss of revenue and/or marketshare, a rationally led company would have already priced its goods at the higher level, because to do otherwise is to forego profit.
In other words, no, companies can't discount taxes in their final prices without consequences. Raised taxes on corporations are therefore not by definition paid by the end customer, as you state.
Slashdot Mirror
If you want the same level of authentication, then no, it is not easier.
And if you don't care about authentication, then you can run nfs4 without kerberos, which is not harder than deploying samba without authentication.
No it's not. If you want the full functionality of NFS4+Kerberos, you need to set up your Samba server as a full Domain Member server in an Active Directory domain, which is quite a task in itself.
Oh dear. You are not just a libertard, you are an illiterate as well. I claimed no such thing; I claimed a post office with universal service had the non-monetary benefit of supporting the legal system; you do realise why it is that mailing a legal document is considered the same as presenting it in person, don't you?
And your second point remains a stupid logical fallacy, so I'm not bothering to answer that. And since you're too stupid to see why that is, you've earned the epithet 'libertard'.
Your last post contained a non-sequitur and a logical fallacy so immediately obvious that the only thing I get from it is that you are almost as bad a libertard as roman_mir.
Diversion noted. You libertards are so predictable; every time someone demolishes your little fantasies with facts, you change the subject.
No, that's common Libertard dogma you're spouting.
Society has more than a monetary benefit from a working post office with universal service. As an example, it enables the smooth functioning of the courts, by being a universal carrier for legal documents.
If you really think that all benefits from a public service can be accounted for in cash, then that serves only as proof that you're a basement-dwelling teenager with walls full of Ayn Rand posters.
You don't even have to go into detail. 'Salvation by faith alone' is a Protestant doctrine, not supported by the Catholic church. That gives you about, what? 50% of all Christians?
Shut the fuck up until you've taken Theology 101. Your statement is flat out invalid for the largest Christian denomination out there.
I really am starting to detest the flat out ignorance, flouted proudly, on religious issues here on Slashdot.
I am not in the least bit sorry to take it out on you: you, sir, are a complete idiot.
Yes, it is pretty crazy to expect more than mere monetary value to come out of an investment.
If you're a libertard, that is.
And bugger all, I made a mistake here. 1 liter is 1 dm3, not one 1m3. OK, you may have a point, that's a bit silly at first sight. The conversion is still simple, but your point stands.
1 and 1000 respectively. So where you get your 'either of these' is a riddle to me.
As to why 1000 grams, that's because the SI unit of weight is the kilogram, and what do you know, one liter of water is 1 kilogram.
No, that's what Americans keep telling themselves to find an excuse for their obesity epidemic.
If you encounter rudeness from open source projects as a matter of course, I would, in your place, start looking if there's a common factor.
Wait, so you admit there is a cultural conditioning for boys to become disruptive little assholes, and it's the teaching methods that have to change?
Exactly. Stripped of its scientific political correctness, all this study does is say that (American) boys are raised to be aggressive, disruptive little assholes.
The misogynistic ranting on this discussion seems to confirm that observation.
One minute of Googling gave me the answer that you set this in your default mime settings, in .local/share/applications/default.list and .local/share/applications/mimeapps.list
Now, this is rather arcane I admit, but that was not my argument. My argument is that anything beyond daily operation (and changing the default file manager is beyond that) requires specialist knowledge, but the Windows fanbois always pretend that this is not true while slagging off Linux.
Of course I was merely joking. I find it rather typical that you seem to take it as an attack of sorts.
And yet the common argument in favour of Windows is that it is so easy to administer; so easy in fact that administrators are easier to come by than *nix admins.
And ever since 2001 people have been telling me that that Linux thing would never catch on because it relied on too many arcane command invocations...
The problem is not that Mauro screwed up. The problem is that he made excuses and blamed someone else for his screw-up. That is flat-out unacceptable in a professional situation.
Focusing on the tone of Linus' argument is missing the point. Linus is right here.
How about Ada?
Let me add a note for the community: yes, they are almost as bad as Apple fanbois when it comes to advocating Ada, but aside from that it's the friendliest community I've ever met on the Internet.
When I as a hobbyist, who dabbles a bit in Ada, can ask questions and get answers from professional industrial programmers with multiple large mission-critical systems to their name, and get these answers in a friendly supportive tone, I think I am justified to say that this is a nice community.
I write the occasional hobby project in it.
Contrary to what people tell you, it is not a complex language at all, it's a fairly standard Algol descendant. It does have an intricate type system that you must get used to to get anything done, and it is a bit wordy, using actual words as identifiers for everything except for some operators, but aside from that it's a very elegant language, and surprisingly fun to work with.
And as Slashdot proves, there are plenty below-30s that refuse to learn anything new because they think they know best already.
This is only true as long as you don't care about Strontium-90 dust all over the place.
You really should think things through before posting.
The theory you are defending states that a tax increase on businesses will be discounted immediately in prices. I'm simply saying that elementary economics says that if such a potential increase could be discounted without loss of revenue and/or marketshare, a rationally led company would have already priced its goods at the higher level, because to do otherwise is to forego profit.
In other words, no, companies can't discount taxes in their final prices without consequences. Raised taxes on corporations are therefore not by definition paid by the end customer, as you state.
Even shorter: you're wrong.