Everything I know about quantum computing leads me to believe this is a silly exercise.
- There's no benefit to having memory on the same chip as it's easier and more reliable to frame the problem and process the results with a non-quantum computer. - Having anything that close to the qubits makes it that much harder to handle decoherence which remains an unsolved problem on large scales. - "Conventional electrical circuits" aren't going to scale and if your quantum computing model can't scale, it's trash.
Slashdot Mirror
Proving once again that stuff gets named after the guy with the cool name.
As there are an infinite number of superpositions of the 0 and 1 state, a -1 wouldn't actually matter.
Everything I know about quantum computing leads me to believe this is a silly exercise.
- There's no benefit to having memory on the same chip as it's easier and more reliable to frame the problem and process the results with a non-quantum computer.
- Having anything that close to the qubits makes it that much harder to handle decoherence which remains an unsolved problem on large scales.
- "Conventional electrical circuits" aren't going to scale and if your quantum computing model can't scale, it's trash.
Publicity stunt?