This does exactly mean the end to security.
on
Quantum Security
·
· Score: 2
It just means a possible end to current security. Maybe this will force us to create a better form of security that we overlooked because the encryption method was so easily the first step.
It's not unprecidented for people to be afraid of technology. Nanophobia, Internetophobia, Technophobia, Slashdotophobia, the list goes on.
What we need is nanopsyhcologists.;)
And no I am not talking about relative as in your Uncle Joe. We need to define OLD here. Let face it
most of those who call things old usually lack imagination as to a usefull purpose things can have. The only answer is usually destruction. When
you destroy something or throw it away, it still has to go somewhere. How about we take our creative hand and control where it goes or how it is used instead of this Throw-Away(TM) mentality of destruction and let fly see where it lands thinking. I can only think of an morbid example. When I die there are many better things my body can do other than bury it under the ground. My body could be donated to science, or maybe ground up for a high quality fertilizer. Alot of brain power is allocated to destroying things, maybe a balance is needed to have an equal part of societies brain power allocated to giving back what we take. We must control everything to have control. BLah Blah what am I talking about...oh well. I had a point but I cant paint a good picture with words. Thanks.
There are serious issues with methanol, such as converting your iron cylinder walls to formates, and cold-starting. There are
problems with alcohol/gasoline blends in general, such as how to make an inexpensive, reliable and accurate fuel-composition
sensor so that the mixture can be set properly for starting.
Who is talking about methanol?
Ok why should we limit our options? While I have some older mopar vehicles that run on gasoline I would not mind running them off moonshine. If it was at the pump or if I would not get arrested for producing it(not likely but possible). On the other hand I would be open to other alternatives
such as electric. But it would seem to be better to goto alcohol for legacy vehicle that are on the road now. Would that not have a better effect in the short term than slowly selling electric vehicles. Henry Ford himself wanted to use alcohol. Would help farmers. Of course there are some alcohol in the vehical laws that might have to be considered. Personally I will go the alcohol
way until they have other alternatives that can be implemeted now at a good cost. And for diesal engines there is the vegitable oil. I can not wait until they are using alot of vegitable oil instead of diesal fuel because I don't really like the smell when I am in traffic. I am working on a plan for myself and so are many others. The more that do this themselfs the better. BTW why are you talking about cat convertors on the microbus... it does not have one. So what is the point? WE are all ready for a change! So lets do it instead of talking about it. There are so many good ideas that are not being used. Lets use them.
There is no one answer. Why does there always have to be 1 answer, 1 magic number, etc. There are an infinite number of reasons why the universe exsists. But being in a limited position fosters the limited views. I say there are many ways to correctly add to this question but there is NO ONE
correct answer.
Thank you.
Slashdot Mirror
It just means a possible end to current security. Maybe this will force us to create a better form of security that we overlooked because the encryption method was so easily the first step.
What did they hook in the Charles River in Boston?
Makes me want to go fishing.
It's not unprecidented for people to be afraid of technology. Nanophobia, Internetophobia, Technophobia, Slashdotophobia, the list goes on. What we need is nanopsyhcologists. ;)
500-to-1 odds sounds like extremely precise calculations..heh. Wonder if they are betting on it in vegas.
Mars the thermite planet. Lets ignite it and have a mini sun for a day or so!
And no I am not talking about relative as in your Uncle Joe. We need to define OLD here. Let face it most of those who call things old usually lack imagination as to a usefull purpose things can have. The only answer is usually destruction. When you destroy something or throw it away, it still has to go somewhere. How about we take our creative hand and control where it goes or how it is used instead of this Throw-Away(TM) mentality of destruction and let fly see where it lands thinking. I can only think of an morbid example. When I die there are many better things my body can do other than bury it under the ground. My body could be donated to science, or maybe ground up for a high quality fertilizer. Alot of brain power is allocated to destroying things, maybe a balance is needed to have an equal part of societies brain power allocated to giving back what we take. We must control everything to have control. BLah Blah what am I talking about...oh well. I had a point but I cant paint a good picture with words. Thanks.
There are serious issues with methanol, such as converting your iron cylinder walls to formates, and cold-starting. There are problems with alcohol/gasoline blends in general, such as how to make an inexpensive, reliable and accurate fuel-composition sensor so that the mixture can be set properly for starting. Who is talking about methanol?
Thanks for the link. It helped me remember some of the details I have forgoten.
Ok why should we limit our options? While I have some older mopar vehicles that run on gasoline I would not mind running them off moonshine. If it was at the pump or if I would not get arrested for producing it(not likely but possible). On the other hand I would be open to other alternatives such as electric. But it would seem to be better to goto alcohol for legacy vehicle that are on the road now. Would that not have a better effect in the short term than slowly selling electric vehicles. Henry Ford himself wanted to use alcohol. Would help farmers. Of course there are some alcohol in the vehical laws that might have to be considered. Personally I will go the alcohol way until they have other alternatives that can be implemeted now at a good cost. And for diesal engines there is the vegitable oil. I can not wait until they are using alot of vegitable oil instead of diesal fuel because I don't really like the smell when I am in traffic. I am working on a plan for myself and so are many others. The more that do this themselfs the better. BTW why are you talking about cat convertors on the microbus... it does not have one. So what is the point? WE are all ready for a change! So lets do it instead of talking about it. There are so many good ideas that are not being used. Lets use them.
...can dance on the head of a pin? How many angels are there? Can angels dance on a pin? Are there even angels?
There is no one answer. Why does there always have to be 1 answer, 1 magic number, etc. There are an infinite number of reasons why the universe exsists. But being in a limited position fosters the limited views. I say there are many ways to correctly add to this question but there is NO ONE correct answer. Thank you.