← Back to Users
Nihilomnis's activity in the archive.
I'll only rest my eyes for a bit.
Yes. If one has a job, is one or the company paying for one's expenses? Just because the purpose of the transaction is different (or lack thereof) does not mean he didn't pay for it. Technically it's arguing over semantics.
I'll only rest my eyes for a bit.
Yes. If one has a job, is one or the company paying for one's expenses? Just because the purpose of the transaction is different (or lack thereof) does not mean he didn't pay for it. Technically it's arguing over semantics.