I imagine it would be a fun sociological experiment, to conduct a real sociological study of the hypothesis you suggest. Of course, there might be some collateral damage... Maybe it would make for a fine movie, anyways;}
Well it's some silliness anyways - an exaggerated presentation of simple information, really. Such tendency for exaggeration in "such things" - it is a large part of why I, myself, will not even try to get a job with such organization. And the world moves on....:)
Strangely enough, I had meant to speak of Verizon, though I'd said Sprint instead. I'm still scratching my head about that, but I suppose it's a kind of "Freudian Slip." So, to correct my statement: Verizon, as far as I know, would still be applying the 5 gig cap they had, a few months ago. I've been out of the loop for a minute, as it were.
Well just hand me the dunce cap now, I had thought I was referring to Verizon though, for some reason, I wanted to say "Sprint" there. (Long night)
It was not a consciously intentional matter of inaccuracy - as I feel I should note - though, I must admit, I didn't really enjoy some of the customer service I got from Sprint, before switching to Verizon. Well, then. Maybe it was a freudian slip of some bad press.
I hadn't heard of the Sprint Unlimited plan, before - might consider switching back to Sprint, or over to AT&T. Still kind of like Verizon though, somehow - abject customer bias, probably nothing more than.
By contrast, Sprint doesn't even offer an unlimited mobile data plan - not without a steep surcharge on data over the limit, for which, a reasonable-enough 5 gits monthly is the top - so, I don't suppose there could be much to complain about, for the AT&T customer.
Slashdot Mirror
I imagine it would be a fun sociological experiment, to conduct a real sociological study of the hypothesis you suggest. Of course, there might be some collateral damage... Maybe it would make for a fine movie, anyways ;}
[Insert j/k tag here]
Well ain't it some nice techno-bling though?
Well it's some silliness anyways - an exaggerated presentation of simple information, really. Such tendency for exaggeration in "such things" - it is a large part of why I, myself, will not even try to get a job with such organization. And the world moves on.... :)
Strangely enough, I had meant to speak of Verizon, though I'd said Sprint instead. I'm still scratching my head about that, but I suppose it's a kind of "Freudian Slip." So, to correct my statement: Verizon, as far as I know, would still be applying the 5 gig cap they had, a few months ago. I've been out of the loop for a minute, as it were.
Well just hand me the dunce cap now, I had thought I was referring to Verizon though, for some reason, I wanted to say "Sprint" there. (Long night)
It was not a consciously intentional matter of inaccuracy - as I feel I should note - though, I must admit, I didn't really enjoy some of the customer service I got from Sprint, before switching to Verizon. Well, then. Maybe it was a freudian slip of some bad press.
I hadn't heard of the Sprint Unlimited plan, before - might consider switching back to Sprint, or over to AT&T. Still kind of like Verizon though, somehow - abject customer bias, probably nothing more than.
Erm, gigs. 5 gigs, I mean. Pardon the slip, folks...
By contrast, Sprint doesn't even offer an unlimited mobile data plan - not without a steep surcharge on data over the limit, for which, a reasonable-enough 5 gits monthly is the top - so, I don't suppose there could be much to complain about, for the AT&T customer.