I wasn't being sarcastic when I said unfortunately the shooter was doing nothing illegal. I literally meant unfortunately: as in, I wish he was, so someone could be held accountable. Yes Utah should have better laws, well no shit Sherlock. That WAS sarcasm. So yes, I agree it's "farcical" you dandy high-school child.
I don't know who the hell you are. I specifically replied to this guy:
"This is exactly why nothing changes. Gun nuts won't accept any responsibility for any bad thing associated with gun ownership. Guns purchased in the U.S. used by Mexican drug cartels, fueling gang violence, or ending up in the hands of the mentally desperate who take out other people with them, it's never because there are just too many guns on the street or that they're too easy to purchase.
If they accepted responsibility for anything it would open the door to some kind of intelligent gun regulation, but we can't have that. So the fault is always somewhere else.
Just like this guy. Guns caused a massive wildfire that prompted the evacuation of thousands of people, but it's all okay. We can't possibly consider restricting outdoor shooting during periods when conditions are bad, that would be limiting their 2nd amendment rights. Even though we restrict campfires, outdoor burning and other activities.
They made an effort to put it out, so the thousands of families living in shelters and firefighters risking their lives, that's all okay. It wasn't the poor gun owner's fault."
Slashdot Mirror
I didn't claim they didn't do anything illegal. That was in the article. Slow your roll bad boy.
I wasn't being sarcastic when I said unfortunately the shooter was doing nothing illegal. I literally meant unfortunately: as in, I wish he was, so someone could be held accountable. Yes Utah should have better laws, well no shit Sherlock. That WAS sarcasm. So yes, I agree it's "farcical" you dandy high-school child. I don't know who the hell you are. I specifically replied to this guy: "This is exactly why nothing changes. Gun nuts won't accept any responsibility for any bad thing associated with gun ownership. Guns purchased in the U.S. used by Mexican drug cartels, fueling gang violence, or ending up in the hands of the mentally desperate who take out other people with them, it's never because there are just too many guns on the street or that they're too easy to purchase. If they accepted responsibility for anything it would open the door to some kind of intelligent gun regulation, but we can't have that. So the fault is always somewhere else. Just like this guy. Guns caused a massive wildfire that prompted the evacuation of thousands of people, but it's all okay. We can't possibly consider restricting outdoor shooting during periods when conditions are bad, that would be limiting their 2nd amendment rights. Even though we restrict campfires, outdoor burning and other activities. They made an effort to put it out, so the thousands of families living in shelters and firefighters risking their lives, that's all okay. It wasn't the poor gun owner's fault."