Personally, I would have a problem with my home ISP (at this time, Insight RR) filtering anything. I pay for open and unfettered access to the net. However, that does not stop mr from adopting a secure setup for my home network. My firewall is setup to automatically drop anything from the RFC 1918 addresses (10.0.0.0, 192.168.0.0), because those should only be used between routers at the core and disro layers, or behind NAT setups. This should also be implemented at the corporate enterprise level, as ACLs on the edge routers. In an ideal world, RFC 2827 would be implemented everywhere, but I'd hate to see it done by governmental regulation...
I don't remember who, (I think i was thomas aquinas) said that nothuing is intrinsically evil. Why then do we automatically feel the need to ban, regulate, whatever, anything that may have been used by unsavory parties?
Yeah, your right, This country was founded with the principles of freedom. To take away our Civil Liberties simply to hunt down a terrorist demeans us down to his level. And who's to say that, once lost our civil liberties will be regained? AOL has already sold out it's myriad of moron customers by handing over e-mail records, and i doubt there was a subpoena issuesd for those records.
-dcviper
Slashdot Mirror
Personally, I would have a problem with my home ISP (at this time, Insight RR) filtering anything. I pay for open and unfettered access to the net. However, that does not stop mr from adopting a secure setup for my home network. My firewall is setup to automatically drop anything from the RFC 1918 addresses (10.0.0.0, 192.168.0.0), because those should only be used between routers at the core and disro layers, or behind NAT setups. This should also be implemented at the corporate enterprise level, as ACLs on the edge routers. In an ideal world, RFC 2827 would be implemented everywhere, but I'd hate to see it done by governmental regulation...
-dcviper (Cisco Certified Network Associate)
-dcviper
Yeah, your right, This country was founded with the principles of freedom. To take away our Civil Liberties simply to hunt down a terrorist demeans us down to his level. And who's to say that, once lost our civil liberties will be regained? AOL has already sold out it's myriad of moron customers by handing over e-mail records, and i doubt there was a subpoena issuesd for those records.
-dcviper
ACLU