http://www.kpnqwest.ee/uudised.php?ID=65 (in Estonian).
It states that the customers will not be plugged out and they're setting up the necessary backup routes.
It is also stated that some HQ supported services (such as roaming) will probably discontinued or reorganized.
Re:Wired News has an article...
on
SMS vs. E-mail?
·
· Score: 2
The article is not entirely accurate. In some European countries you do pay per-minute for voice calls (as opposed to the claim in the article), and per-message for SMS. I pay ~13.5 cents per minute for voice calls and ~11 cents for one SMS message sent. That much is true that the reciever (call or message) doesn't pay anything. Heck, some advertising campaigns even promise to pay the reciever!
But I think that is just why RedHat's announcement is a good thing. If mozilla.org is not going to release 1.0.1 or similar then I think RedHat is going to!
RedHat distributes it's own patched kernel and gcc packages for example, I don't see why it should be different with Mozilla.
In my opinion, mozilla.org should follow a development process similar to the linux kernel with a development branch and stable branch, but they are opposed to this, it seems.
How does it seem they are opposed to this? They just haven't gotten to the stable branch yet! They're still on the development branch, you know.
Slashdot Mirror
It seems the same applies to KPNQwest Estonia.
http://www.kpnqwest.ee/uudised.php?ID=65 (in Estonian).
It states that the customers will not be plugged out and they're setting up the necessary backup routes.
It is also stated that some HQ supported services (such as roaming) will probably discontinued or reorganized.
The article is not entirely accurate. In some European countries you do pay per-minute for voice calls (as opposed to the claim in the article), and per-message for SMS. I pay ~13.5 cents per minute for voice calls and ~11 cents for one SMS message sent. That much is true that the reciever (call or message) doesn't pay anything. Heck, some advertising campaigns even promise to pay the reciever!
I use junkbuster when surfing the web. It effectively disables all banner-ads and such.
Using text-ads not included with some stupid ilayer or iframe would be much more effective, because junkbuster can't catch them. Simple!
Hmmm... you might be right on this one.
But I think that is just why RedHat's announcement is a good thing. If mozilla.org is not going to release 1.0.1 or similar then I think RedHat is going to!
RedHat distributes it's own patched kernel and gcc packages for example, I don't see why it should be different with Mozilla.
In my opinion, mozilla.org should follow a development process similar to the linux kernel with a development branch and stable branch, but they are opposed to this, it seems.
How does it seem they are opposed to this? They just haven't gotten to the stable branch yet! They're still on the development branch, you know.Hey, what about Lynx! Except for the Javascript of course.