Why not just have the "HELO" message in the mail system announce what type of e-mail is not welcome. All we need is a standard that is clear. I suspect that with such a standard in place the analogy to an apartment complex having a "no solicitation" sign up would be obvious to our lawmakers.
Mark
This is off-topic?
I think whoever moderated this down needs a clue. Grover's algorithm does run in O(n^.5) and it is the algorithm which uses a Quantum computer to do a linear search. It is one of the few applications of QCs to real problems.
It is also interesting to note that it has been proven that QCs do NOT speed up sorting beyond O(nlog(n)). Which is somewhat shocking given the search speedup.
Wrong.
One has to go after the companies that host the spammers. Going after the spammers themselves is just like playing "wack-a-mole", they pop up somewhere else.
So what about those people who are "real" users on media3s system? They get poor service and end up moving out. Media3 loses customers. Ideally whoever hosting media3 gets sick of them and drops them too. Only by actively going after the spammers, and where needed, the hosting company, does anything get done.
Mark
Slashdot Mirror
Why not just have the "HELO" message in the mail system announce what type of e-mail is not welcome. All we need is a standard that is clear. I suspect that with such a standard in place the analogy to an apartment complex having a "no solicitation" sign up would be obvious to our lawmakers. Mark
This is off-topic? I think whoever moderated this down needs a clue. Grover's algorithm does run in O(n^.5) and it is the algorithm which uses a Quantum computer to do a linear search. It is one of the few applications of QCs to real problems. It is also interesting to note that it has been proven that QCs do NOT speed up sorting beyond O(nlog(n)). Which is somewhat shocking given the search speedup.
Wrong. One has to go after the companies that host the spammers. Going after the spammers themselves is just like playing "wack-a-mole", they pop up somewhere else. So what about those people who are "real" users on media3s system? They get poor service and end up moving out. Media3 loses customers. Ideally whoever hosting media3 gets sick of them and drops them too. Only by actively going after the spammers, and where needed, the hosting company, does anything get done. Mark