Slashdot Mirror


User: Joikas

Joikas's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
14
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 14

  1. Re:so. on Filesharing Now an Official Religion In Sweden · · Score: 2

    Copyright has nothing to do with payment or lack of it. Copyright just gives creator the right to control his work.

  2. Re:Is the clipboard on Filesharing Now an Official Religion In Sweden · · Score: 1

    No, if they were Evangelical Kopimists, then they would violate GPL just like every other copyright license.

  3. Re:I'm ashamed for being a Swede when this kind of on Filesharing Now an Official Religion In Sweden · · Score: 1

    That island shooter is Norwegian.

  4. Re:Chrome sucks anyways... on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 2

    News at 10. Google gets paid by advertisers for ad clicks, not ad views.

    You're being ignorant. Google gets paid for impressions if they're image ads or video ads.

  5. Re:Wha? on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 0

    Google loses money by placing it's ads as that could have been a paying customers ad in that position that they would have actually had outside money coming in paying for.

    No they don't. IN FACT, they're taking the bids others pay up by doing that. This means they're artificially charging other browser makers more per click because now they have to outbid Google. If that's not evil I don't know what is.

  6. Re:Religious Freedom on Filesharing Now an Official Religion In Sweden · · Score: 2

    No, they can seize all they want. Religions don't exempt you from laws.

  7. Re:It could be worse on Filesharing Now an Official Religion In Sweden · · Score: 0

    Only so in the western world. Buddhist countries, especially Theravada ones, lack that. That's why they're much more saner religions than western ones.

  8. Re:Is the clipboard on Filesharing Now an Official Religion In Sweden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Creative Commons license, and GPL for that matter, are pro-copyright by their very definition. Only public domain is anti-copyright.

  9. Re:Google still is different from other companies. on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 1

    Which means they're only bringing the price up for other browsers while they themselves don't need to pay anything. Yeah, that's completely not evil!

  10. Re:Google still is different from other companies. on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 0

    Google was fully aware of it. Companies give REPORTS of what they do. You don't just buy services and not expect them not to report what they have they have done or what they're going to do. That would be just waste of money.

  11. Re:Google still is different from other companies. on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I only contracted a hitman to kill your wife. I did nothing wrong myself!

  12. Re:First post! on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, you remember when Steve Jobs said "Do no evil is a load of crap"? He was absolutely correct about Google.

  13. Re:Good for Google on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 2

    They didn't "punish" themselves in any way. Whole google.com should be removed from search results since they were gaming it. They didn't even punish it for search terms like browser. It's still on top thanks to ad spots!

  14. Re:Wha? on Google Punishing Chrome Results For 60 Days · · Score: 1

    +1 this is so spot on. It amazes me that you guys let Google get away with this but when others do the same it's suddenly bad.