Relatable's technology identifies music based on the recordings themselves and analyzes the acoustical properties of a recording's waveform to identify it precisely, regardless of its audio format, bit rate or minor signal distortion, the companies said.
So, in theory, couldn't you just reverse the wav so the file is actually backwards? There's a ton of audio programs out there that can reverse the wav on a whim. From the description of the new filters it sounds like they wouldn't recognize it anymore......well, save for Paul is dead and Judas Priest telling me to off my parents.
As a massive videophile, I picked this little sucker up as soon as I saw it. The lowdown is this:
Picture quality blows....but what do you expect, it's $75.
There is a fixed lens which they say you can focus by taking off the front casing, though i haven't had any luck with their method.
The transmission is ok. I live in a house with a basement, the camera would work fine on the same floor as the receiver, though transmitting between floors is no good. It will go thorough walls with some interference. It will not transmit when put in the freezer with the door closed.
I do all kinds of video stuff, one of which is live mixing/projections at raves. I was really hoping the camera would work there as a wireless livecam, but the damned thing wouldn't transmit at all. I guess with all the interference of electronics the signal just couldn't be processed well. All I got was an indistinguishable b&w image.
As far as the neato factor goes, the cam is pretty good. If you are using it at home and don't mind the occasional hiccups in transmission and poor picture quality, then it's not a bad buy.
It is only $75, and it is a camera, though I was hoping for something like the old Fisher Price Pixelvision PXL2000, it is no where near as cool.
--negspace
"can't depend on honest answers from dependent hands. won't accept an honest answer from an open hand." --jimmy eat world
Slashdot Mirror
Relatable's technology identifies music based on the recordings themselves and analyzes the acoustical properties of a recording's waveform to identify it precisely, regardless of its audio format, bit rate or minor signal distortion, the companies said.
So, in theory, couldn't you just reverse the wav so the file is actually backwards? There's a ton of audio programs out there that can reverse the wav on a whim. From the description of the new filters it sounds like they wouldn't recognize it anymore......well, save for Paul is dead and Judas Priest telling me to off my parents.
As a massive videophile, I picked this little sucker up as soon as I saw it. The lowdown is this:
Picture quality blows....but what do you expect, it's $75.
There is a fixed lens which they say you can focus by taking off the front casing, though i haven't had any luck with their method.
The transmission is ok. I live in a house with a basement, the camera would work fine on the same floor as the receiver, though transmitting between floors is no good. It will go thorough walls with some interference. It will not transmit when put in the freezer with the door closed.
I do all kinds of video stuff, one of which is live mixing/projections at raves. I was really hoping the camera would work there as a wireless livecam, but the damned thing wouldn't transmit at all. I guess with all the interference of electronics the signal just couldn't be processed well. All I got was an indistinguishable b&w image.
As far as the neato factor goes, the cam is pretty good. If you are using it at home and don't mind the occasional hiccups in transmission and poor picture quality, then it's not a bad buy.
It is only $75, and it is a camera, though I was hoping for something like the old Fisher Price Pixelvision PXL2000, it is no where near as cool.
--negspace
"can't depend on honest answers from dependent hands. won't accept an honest answer from an open hand." --jimmy eat world