Isn't the real problem that schools feel the need to teach global warming at all? I think that's the heart of what's rubbing all the skeptics the wrong way. They see the disproportionate attention that is paid to a phenomenon that is weakly proven and thus far totally inconsequential in terms of a miniscule sea level and temperature rise, plus pretty much the same climate everywhere that existed 100 years ago. The obvious conclusion is that a bunch of people are trying to work some propaganda into impressionable schoolkids' school experiences--and that's really annoying.
Isn't the real problem that schools feel the need to teach global warming at all? I think that's the heart of what's rubbing all the skeptics the wrong way. They see the disproportionate attention that is paid to a phenomenon that is weakly proven and thus far totally inconsequential in terms of a miniscule sea level and temperature rise, plus pretty much the same climate everywhere that existed 100 years ago. The obvious conclusion is that a bunch of people are trying to work some propaganda into impressionable schoolkids' school experiences--and that's really annoying.