Too bad she doesn't have actual medical proof as I do on memory problems.
I have been tested many times by medical professionals and results are the same that I have severe memory problems.
I have good days and bad days. It is the result of brain surgery for a brain aneurysm, then being over radiated three months later to my head and neck for cancer.
Today is a good day for me so far, but I have had people ask me their passwords for when I worked on their computer a couple of years before...ye right lol
I have people write their passwords down when I work on their computers, as many times I have to look at the password they wrote down every time I login to their computer.
She may or may not remember the password, but they will have to PROVE she can't remember it.
It is not contempt of court if they think they have evidence against her, it is up to THEM to provide it, not her.
If she is saying 'If you think there is something there, you're welcome to it, but I don't know how to get into it'
She is cooperating in the fact that in what they think is evidence, she has given it to them for THEM to determine if it is incriminating evidence. It is up to THEM to PROVE it, not her.
Slashdot Mirror
Too bad she doesn't have actual medical proof as I do on memory problems. I have been tested many times by medical professionals and results are the same that I have severe memory problems. I have good days and bad days. It is the result of brain surgery for a brain aneurysm, then being over radiated three months later to my head and neck for cancer. Today is a good day for me so far, but I have had people ask me their passwords for when I worked on their computer a couple of years before...ye right lol I have people write their passwords down when I work on their computers, as many times I have to look at the password they wrote down every time I login to their computer. She may or may not remember the password, but they will have to PROVE she can't remember it. It is not contempt of court if they think they have evidence against her, it is up to THEM to provide it, not her. If she is saying 'If you think there is something there, you're welcome to it, but I don't know how to get into it' She is cooperating in the fact that in what they think is evidence, she has given it to them for THEM to determine if it is incriminating evidence. It is up to THEM to PROVE it, not her.