With the current quality of care measles isn't that dangerous.
In earlier times people brought their children to 'measle parties' to get infected at a young age, from which they mostly recovered wonderfully, in order to get lifetime immunity. The girls would later pass that immunity, temprarily, to their children during breast feeding, so they weren't at risk of contracting it at a very young age where it could have been dangerous for them.
Sounds great to me.
Being forced to wear seatbelts, or enforcing food safety don't violate your inherent right to bodily integrity, as established per the Neurenberg trial.
And no randomly controlled double blind research into whether those vaccines are even effective or not, let alone whether they are harmless or not.
You are the experiment.
His professor who was his co-author filed a case in court which ruled that the procedure of taking his medical license was totally inappropriate, without merit and should be undone. Wakefield was not able to retain his license because in his enthusiasm he had done something that he shouldn't have done, but which bares no relationship with his scientific results. The fact that you don't seem to know this makes it very clear that you no really know what you're talking about.
Wakefield didn't advise against MMR, he advised against the combination with mumps and rubella and wanted a time frame of on year in between.
Please get your facts straight, or post your bullshit in the daily mail forums.
If such a big part of the, mostly well educated, upper classers is weary of vaccinations, then I'd would ask myself if there weren't a good reason for this, instead of repeating the old fear mongering pharmaceutical propaganda. Get some facts, for instance. Real facts. Not assumptions.
Your 'nut jobs' is very offensive towards the people who really very thoroughly have deliberated to vaccinate their kids, yes or no. Claiming that they are merely 'nut jobs' is absolutely disrespectful, and an undeserved micro-agression.
Immunization isn't 100% effective indeed, and it isn't 100% harmless also. THAT is why some people decide not to vaccinate. But not everybody knows about some adverse side effects of vaccination. Like you, probably.
Further, since the Neurenberg trial it was internationally decided that NOBODY could be forced to undergo a medical treatment without their fully informed consent.
So, people do have the right not to get vaccinated.
Where is the evidence we need vaccination? At the time the vaccination campagnes were started most infecious diseases were already brought back by a factor of 200, just by hygienic measures. Of course after the vaccination campaigns started those numbers went down further, because quality of life and hygiene improved even further.
Can you give one randomly controlled double blind study in a 'respectable' peer reviewed journal that proves vaccines are effective?
Ever heard of vaccine damages?
Ever heard of rogue pharmaceutical industry (Vyox), corruption, revolving doors to the FDA, CDC, NIH?
I'd suggest you acquire some knowledge--not fear mongering propaganda--before you blurt highly opiniated unbased opinion.
Mumps, measles, chicken pox do not really require vaccination.
The American government has indemnified the pharmaceutical industry from any vaccine damage claims because the amounts the industry had to pay due to health damages led them to blackmail the government: Either indemnify us, or no more vaccines.
So, they got (of course) what they wanted, got indemnified, and now the American tax payer has payed damage compensations of more than 4 billion dollars to people who are damaged by vaccines AND who know their way to the vaccine damage 'court'. It is reasonable to assume that there are much more damages caused than those compensated.
Vaccines are not without risk, so your argument works both ways.
The indemnification of the pharmaceutical industry has led them to push an incredible number of vaccines upon the people, because they can't be held liable anymore.
Expect some more damages.
is that he isn't the real Satoshi but a smoke screen to hide the fact that bitcoin was in fact a CIA/Central Banks project.
There has been a Mr. Nakamoto who first 'admitted' that he was part of the project, but then later retracted that.
I think he was true, and that the project was to get a 'bottom up' financial semi-revolution going in order to enable a worldwide acceptance of virtual but perfectly traceable money, so that eventually, when we have been led into the 'cashless society', all our transactions can be traced and there is no escape whatsoever from the bank fees, bank tax, government tax etc. etc.
That must have been what Gavin Andresen has been doing the one or two times that he visited Langley. He must be in on the game, judging from the fact that he 'approved' the flawed signature that Wright presented. He can't have been that naive so he must have been in on the game.
Proof of this? None. Just my two cents. So now kill me, moderate me down and take away all my karma.;)
Yes, and then they'll find a content that still is encrypted and password protected.
And if the judge puts me 7 months in prison for 'contempt' I guaranteedly will absolutely have forgotten the password when I contact them that I would like to help them decrypt the phone, but that unfortunately I have forgotten the password.
I was referring to, and of course you knew that, the use of nuclear energy for the production of electrical energy.
Ever heard of Chernobyl, Fukushima (which isn't over yet)?
These two 'experiments' and examples of human and corporate stupidity show me that nuclear energy is not the answer.
Slashdot Mirror
Says the panicking herd...
Now wait for the stampede...
With the current quality of care measles isn't that dangerous.
In earlier times people brought their children to 'measle parties' to get infected at a young age, from which they mostly recovered wonderfully, in order to get lifetime immunity. The girls would later pass that immunity, temprarily, to their children during breast feeding, so they weren't at risk of contracting it at a very young age where it could have been dangerous for them.
Sounds great to me.
'Subset', do you have an accurate number of people involved?
I'm not for mandatory military conscription. :)
Being forced to wear seatbelts, or enforcing food safety don't violate your inherent right to bodily integrity, as established per the Neurenberg trial.
...potential disease outbreak...
Give some numbers please plus their evidence, if it's not merely fear based.
And no randomly controlled double blind research into whether those vaccines are even effective or not, let alone whether they are harmless or not.
You are the experiment.
Divide and conquer. Let one part of the herd control the other part, and your life as a ruler will be easy.
...there are people who can't get vaccines because of legit reasons...
Care to elaborate this with numbers, so we can calculate the risks?
His professor who was his co-author filed a case in court which ruled that the procedure of taking his medical license was totally inappropriate, without merit and should be undone. Wakefield was not able to retain his license because in his enthusiasm he had done something that he shouldn't have done, but which bares no relationship with his scientific results. The fact that you don't seem to know this makes it very clear that you no really know what you're talking about.
Wakefield didn't advise against MMR, he advised against the combination with mumps and rubella and wanted a time frame of on year in between.
Please get your facts straight, or post your bullshit in the daily mail forums.
If such a big part of the, mostly well educated, upper classers is weary of vaccinations, then I'd would ask myself if there weren't a good reason for this, instead of repeating the old fear mongering pharmaceutical propaganda. Get some facts, for instance. Real facts. Not assumptions.
The fear mongering is the same.
Whaaahhhh! An unsupervised child!
Whaaahhhh! (pointing) An unvaccinated child!
Ridiculous.
Your 'nut jobs' is very offensive towards the people who really very thoroughly have deliberated to vaccinate their kids, yes or no. Claiming that they are merely 'nut jobs' is absolutely disrespectful, and an undeserved micro-agression.
Immunization isn't 100% effective indeed, and it isn't 100% harmless also. THAT is why some people decide not to vaccinate. But not everybody knows about some adverse side effects of vaccination. Like you, probably.
Further, since the Neurenberg trial it was internationally decided that NOBODY could be forced to undergo a medical treatment without their fully informed consent.
So, people do have the right not to get vaccinated.
If someone gets a measles jab, or even a booster, they shed the virus for weeks. You kid would be really at risk then, from a vaccinated person.
"...vuile ashole..." Are you some frustrated Dutch or so?
Your children are vaccinated, aren't they? So how can they at risk in anyway from any unvaccinated child? What a failed logic.
Where is the evidence we need vaccination? At the time the vaccination campagnes were started most infecious diseases were already brought back by a factor of 200, just by hygienic measures. Of course after the vaccination campaigns started those numbers went down further, because quality of life and hygiene improved even further.
Can you give one randomly controlled double blind study in a 'respectable' peer reviewed journal that proves vaccines are effective?
Being intelligent doesn't make one informed.
Ever heard of vaccine damages?
Ever heard of rogue pharmaceutical industry (Vyox), corruption, revolving doors to the FDA, CDC, NIH?
I'd suggest you acquire some knowledge--not fear mongering propaganda--before you blurt highly opiniated unbased opinion.
the very second a child's health is put at risk
Mumps, measles, chicken pox do not really require vaccination.
The American government has indemnified the pharmaceutical industry from any vaccine damage claims because the amounts the industry had to pay due to health damages led them to blackmail the government: Either indemnify us, or no more vaccines.
So, they got (of course) what they wanted, got indemnified, and now the American tax payer has payed damage compensations of more than 4 billion dollars to people who are damaged by vaccines AND who know their way to the vaccine damage 'court'. It is reasonable to assume that there are much more damages caused than those compensated.
Vaccines are not without risk, so your argument works both ways.
The indemnification of the pharmaceutical industry has led them to push an incredible number of vaccines upon the people, because they can't be held liable anymore.
Expect some more damages.
I have incontrovertible proof of this
At least I stated that I don't have any proof and that it was only my opinion.
is that he isn't the real Satoshi but a smoke screen to hide the fact that bitcoin was in fact a CIA/Central Banks project. ;)
There has been a Mr. Nakamoto who first 'admitted' that he was part of the project, but then later retracted that.
I think he was true, and that the project was to get a 'bottom up' financial semi-revolution going in order to enable a worldwide acceptance of virtual but perfectly traceable money, so that eventually, when we have been led into the 'cashless society', all our transactions can be traced and there is no escape whatsoever from the bank fees, bank tax, government tax etc. etc.
That must have been what Gavin Andresen has been doing the one or two times that he visited Langley. He must be in on the game, judging from the fact that he 'approved' the flawed signature that Wright presented. He can't have been that naive so he must have been in on the game.
Proof of this? None. Just my two cents. So now kill me, moderate me down and take away all my karma.
..that they're doing fine.
Wake up! You still think you're free?
Yes, and then they'll find a content that still is encrypted and password protected.
And if the judge puts me 7 months in prison for 'contempt' I guaranteedly will absolutely have forgotten the password when I contact them that I would like to help them decrypt the phone, but that unfortunately I have forgotten the password.
I was referring to, and of course you knew that, the use of nuclear energy for the production of electrical energy.
Ever heard of Chernobyl, Fukushima (which isn't over yet)?
These two 'experiments' and examples of human and corporate stupidity show me that nuclear energy is not the answer.