There is no reason to keep it longer than 7 years. It's worthless information that doesn't matter to the provider, why wouldn't they delete it?
Try telling this to someone that was diagnosed with cancer further back than the retention period. Many diseases come back 10, 15 or more years not the future. This information could be invaluable...
I would consider the galaxy S3 if it were not for the fact that my organization has standardized onto iOS platform. Sine they develop specific apps for our day-to-day activities I am stuck on the platform.
The new S3 is intriguing I must admit.
We don't need a longer school year. What we need is better holiday distribution. RIght now where I live (Ontario, Canada) our kids get two weeks off in December, one in March and about 9 in the summer.
Just try and convince our coddled teachers to do that...
I am not sure that you are attributing things correctly to the USADA and their scientific knowledge. If you think that the USADA truly believed that you could "ingest EPO" and that would make it appear in samples whereas small intravenous doses would not, you know absolutely nothing about what you are speaking of. EPO is a protein - any protein you "ingest" will be digested by your stomach and will neve appear in any urine test as it will only remain in its most simple form - amino acids.
If the USADA actually thought that you could ingest EPO and they could catch you then they are even dumber scientists than they already come off as.
I am still waiting for someone to truly show me that they have caught Lance cheating, not that they have decided to modify the rules that say you are cheating after the fact. Nor have I seen how the USADA is accounting for the fact that at least once in the timeline that they say that Lance was using EPO that the manufacturers of EPO changed their formulation of EPO which changed the way that EPO would appear on testing because the ratios of the various isoforms changed and caused some severe problems. Look up "Pure Red Cell Aplasia" and look for its links to EPO and the formulation change (or even the ridiculously high incidence of PRCA in Asia as a result of many new types of EPO that have flooded the market as biosimilars).
Still waiting for some truly scientific proof.
Slashdot Mirror
I think that the Luciferase gene has to have the greatest name ever in biology!
Take off! To my great white north... I never realized as a Canuck how many times I say eh!
Woo hoo! First eh!
The same thing happened in the city of Ottawa
Lipitor does not make it difficult to digest fats... It reduces you body's ability to make cholesterol, but has no effect on fat digestion.
There is no reason to keep it longer than 7 years. It's worthless information that doesn't matter to the provider, why wouldn't they delete it?
Try telling this to someone that was diagnosed with cancer further back than the retention period. Many diseases come back 10, 15 or more years not the future. This information could be invaluable...
I would consider the galaxy S3 if it were not for the fact that my organization has standardized onto iOS platform. Sine they develop specific apps for our day-to-day activities I am stuck on the platform. The new S3 is intriguing I must admit.
We don't need a longer school year. What we need is better holiday distribution. RIght now where I live (Ontario, Canada) our kids get two weeks off in December, one in March and about 9 in the summer.
Just try and convince our coddled teachers to do that...
I am not sure that you are attributing things correctly to the USADA and their scientific knowledge. If you think that the USADA truly believed that you could "ingest EPO" and that would make it appear in samples whereas small intravenous doses would not, you know absolutely nothing about what you are speaking of. EPO is a protein - any protein you "ingest" will be digested by your stomach and will neve appear in any urine test as it will only remain in its most simple form - amino acids. If the USADA actually thought that you could ingest EPO and they could catch you then they are even dumber scientists than they already come off as. I am still waiting for someone to truly show me that they have caught Lance cheating, not that they have decided to modify the rules that say you are cheating after the fact. Nor have I seen how the USADA is accounting for the fact that at least once in the timeline that they say that Lance was using EPO that the manufacturers of EPO changed their formulation of EPO which changed the way that EPO would appear on testing because the ratios of the various isoforms changed and caused some severe problems. Look up "Pure Red Cell Aplasia" and look for its links to EPO and the formulation change (or even the ridiculously high incidence of PRCA in Asia as a result of many new types of EPO that have flooded the market as biosimilars). Still waiting for some truly scientific proof.
The clinical trials are under way in Ottawa at this moment. There were also several trials years ago... Right when I started getting a permanent cold!