Any AI with a FPGA starts with a limited number of inputs:
x inputs with values 0 or 1 (or neither) == 2^x (++) possibles.
Any AI with a FPGA ends with a limited number of outputs:
y outputs with values 0 or 1 (or unknown) == 2^y (++) possibles
Inputs-to-Outputs are linked (joined, coupled, etc) by the logic between them (a 'black-box' so-to-speak). An 'evolve' can never happen without linking output to input (feedback).
So, all AI inputs/outputs are constrained by their outputs and their sampling periods.
So for some boxes, an input of (properly encoded)"what is the meaning of the universe?" will return "43". After tuning, these boxes may produce "4f*@#%(#@" or perhaps "forth", "For Linux", "forsooth, BG", "for you use..." or "for more useless answers, call your ISP, then ask BG; if in doubt, ask your mother".
This box apparently returned a tone.
Hmmm...
In the christmas/new year tradition...
this is true intelligence.
I wonder... Looking at their website with it's
bumper graphic, who would want any sort of
graphical viewer produced by such a concern ?
Hmmm..
I wonder... in reading the opinions on the news
page (take a look at the 2nd info page, too),
why anyone should want to invest their (or their
company's, their shareholder's, etc) money or
their time (effort, hopes) in such a concern.
Hmmm...(spirited !)
I wonder... if there are certain parts of this
concern's 'product' that are GPL, and other
parts that are not, why doesn't this concern
make it clear (or reasonably so) what is and
what is not GPL ? (... Does this concern know
the difference ?)
>> Publish the GPL source part only per the
GPL terms (blah, blah, blah).
>> Make demands on other developers about how
to credit you for your efforts on the LGPL
part(s),
>> CLEARLY INDICATE the non-GPL/LGPL parts.
I wonder... does this concern know what a
binary distro is ? Check out: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/users_against_develop ers.html
especially read under Reasons... 'Law'.
Other thoughts:
"MPlayer STOLEN by russian OS/2 users" ??? (my
emphasis from the MPlayer news page). What a
crock of shi**t. (lets start by "Which OS/2
USERS 'stole' MPlayer" ??? or maybe just "Let's
NOT SUPPORT CRIMINALS" blah, blah, blah).
Last thoughts:
fishes under the bridges eating the worms near
the net. where does the mirror reflect ?
Slashdot Mirror
Any AI with a FPGA starts with a limited number of inputs:
x inputs with values 0 or 1 (or neither) == 2^x (++) possibles.
Any AI with a FPGA ends with a limited number of outputs:
y outputs with values 0 or 1 (or unknown) == 2^y (++) possibles
Inputs-to-Outputs are linked (joined, coupled, etc) by the logic between them (a 'black-box' so-to-speak). An 'evolve' can never happen without linking output to input (feedback).
So, all AI inputs/outputs are constrained by their outputs and their sampling periods.
So for some boxes, an input of (properly encoded)"what is the meaning of the universe?" will return "43". After tuning, these boxes may produce "4f*@#%(#@" or perhaps "forth", "For Linux", "forsooth, BG", "for you use..." or "for more useless answers, call your ISP, then ask BG; if in doubt, ask your mother".
This box apparently returned a tone.
Hmmm...
In the christmas/new year tradition...
this is true intelligence.
I wonder ... Looking at their website with it's
... in reading the opinions on the news
... if there are certain parts of this
... Does this concern know
... does this concern know what a
p ers.html
... 'Law'.
bumper graphic, who would want any sort of
graphical viewer produced by such a concern ?
Hmmm..
I wonder
page (take a look at the 2nd info page, too),
why anyone should want to invest their (or their
company's, their shareholder's, etc) money or
their time (effort, hopes) in such a concern.
Hmmm...(spirited !)
I wonder
concern's 'product' that are GPL, and other
parts that are not, why doesn't this concern
make it clear (or reasonably so) what is and
what is not GPL ? (
the difference ?)
>> Publish the GPL source part only per the
GPL terms (blah, blah, blah).
>> Make demands on other developers about how
to credit you for your efforts on the LGPL
part(s),
>> CLEARLY INDICATE the non-GPL/LGPL parts.
I wonder
binary distro is ? Check out: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/users_against_develo
especially read under Reasons
Other thoughts:
"MPlayer STOLEN by russian OS/2 users" ??? (my
emphasis from the MPlayer news page). What a
crock of shi**t. (lets start by "Which OS/2
USERS 'stole' MPlayer" ??? or maybe just "Let's
NOT SUPPORT CRIMINALS" blah, blah, blah).
Last thoughts:
fishes under the bridges eating the worms near
the net. where does the mirror reflect ?