That's a rather narrow-minded approach, wouldn't you say? Granted, his past movies have tended to be primarily 'entertainment' pieces, but why does that have to hold true for the future. Okay, so this particular film failed -- who's fault was it? Arnolds? The writers? The directors? When I go to see a movie, I'm open to all possibilities: sure, maybe the actors weren't too 'meaningful' in previous films, but I'm not seeing one of their 'previous' films, I'm seeing their latest... and as such, I remain open minded.
Life's more enlightening that way...
Slashdot Mirror
That's a rather narrow-minded approach, wouldn't you say? Granted, his past movies have tended to be primarily 'entertainment' pieces, but why does that have to hold true for the future. Okay, so this particular film failed -- who's fault was it? Arnolds? The writers? The directors? When I go to see a movie, I'm open to all possibilities: sure, maybe the actors weren't too 'meaningful' in previous films, but I'm not seeing one of their 'previous' films, I'm seeing their latest ... and as such, I remain open minded.
Life's more enlightening that way ...