They have mastered the art of human body modification. Just look at how much the local ladyboys (shemales) can alter their body to make them look perfect. I know, I now live here and have a ladyboy girlfriend. In every part she is much better than women too - hard working, seriously cute, nice to be with and honest. On top of that she has a great body and actually takes good care of herself. Once you go ladyboy, you never go back.
I know you're being sarcastic, but yes, they should. There's companies who actually care about user's privacy and make md5 hash of the password on the client side. Google does not. This despite the fact that their services need JavaScript enabled, so saying that user might have JS disabled is no valid excuse. Hashing the password on client side would greatly increase security and show that the company actually cares about its users.
I think it's funny that people complain about this while still happily submitting their clear-text passwords to Google. From there it goes to any non-honest Google admin to use and exploit. On top of that most people use the same password everywhere, so you're basically giving Google access to everything you have. Really wise, indeed.
Slashdot Mirror
They have mastered the art of human body modification. Just look at how much the local ladyboys (shemales) can alter their body to make them look perfect. I know, I now live here and have a ladyboy girlfriend. In every part she is much better than women too - hard working, seriously cute, nice to be with and honest. On top of that she has a great body and actually takes good care of herself. Once you go ladyboy, you never go back.
I know you're being sarcastic, but yes, they should. There's companies who actually care about user's privacy and make md5 hash of the password on the client side. Google does not. This despite the fact that their services need JavaScript enabled, so saying that user might have JS disabled is no valid excuse. Hashing the password on client side would greatly increase security and show that the company actually cares about its users.
Back in the day you couldnt even BUY a computer without windows on it.
Yes you could. Stop making up stuff.
I think it's funny that people complain about this while still happily submitting their clear-text passwords to Google. From there it goes to any non-honest Google admin to use and exploit. On top of that most people use the same password everywhere, so you're basically giving Google access to everything you have. Really wise, indeed.