Implying that Peacefire was somehow "censored" *IN ANY WAY* by MAPS is lunacy. A network abuser, Media3, was blackholed for network abuse following the procedures outline in http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/ - pure and simple. Attempts to portray this as an act of censorship lodged even remotely in the direction of Peacefire is defective logic and argumentation. It's also evidence of shallow comprehension and poor research skills. "Jamie" presents him/herself in this article (presumably unintentionally) as a gullible technical illiterate.
Slashdot Mirror
Implying that Peacefire was somehow "censored" *IN ANY WAY* by MAPS is lunacy. A network abuser, Media3, was blackholed for network abuse following the procedures outline in http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/ - pure and simple. Attempts to portray this as an act of censorship lodged even remotely in the direction of Peacefire is defective logic and argumentation. It's also evidence of shallow comprehension and poor research skills. "Jamie" presents him/herself in this article (presumably unintentionally) as a gullible technical illiterate.