What a dumb move. "Buy elsewhere". Like if anyone can afford to be elitist these days of bloody competition.
But of course I'll vote with my wallet and buy elsewhere; they don't deserve my money.
Coming soon: SCO vs. Montavista
on
RT Linux Patches
·
· Score: 1
And of course, Montavista stole all this code from SCO since there is no other way Linux could have gotten real time capabilities that were already present in System V Unix. SCO to sue Montavista, film at eleven.
Now that a code snippet has been shown is it possible to tell by comparing different Linux versions who put it there? If SCO is right, and somebody stole code from their System V Unix, then that person deserves a good kick.
Slashdot Mirror
What a dumb move. "Buy elsewhere". Like if anyone can afford to be elitist these days of bloody competition.
But of course I'll vote with my wallet and buy elsewhere; they don't deserve my money.
And of course, Montavista stole all this code from SCO since there is no other way Linux could have gotten real time capabilities that were already present in System V Unix. SCO to sue Montavista, film at eleven.
Now that a code snippet has been shown is it possible to tell by comparing different Linux versions who put it there? If SCO is right, and somebody stole code from their System V Unix, then that person deserves a good kick.
Actually they should be linking to the patch (patch-2.4.16.bz2) rather than to the full tarball.