Were scared into, misinformed and generally lied to in order to get them to vote against equal rights, removing an existing right and attempting to get gay couples forcibly divorced.
Get it right, dont gloss over the 8 campaign and the hatred and lies it was spewing.
No, he was trying to get rights taken away from a group of people that has no bearing on his own personal life, no impact whatsoever, just doing it because its icky / their religion said so.
The other group pointed out that this is MORE than a little shitty of the guy, and that maybe you shouldnt support the organisation that employs that person.
Same sex marriage was already legal, prop 8 removed that. Any chance youre NOT a retarded fuckwit with no knowledge of history on the topic your spouiting off about? No? OK then:)
So hetero marriage is such an unstable concept that someone else being able to lvoe and marry the consenting adult they want to spend the rest of their lives with would give serious concerns to the stability of hetero marriage?
Its like banning everyone from eating doughnuts because youre on a diet, and eating doughnuts may cause your diet to crumble.
No, you need to take appropriate legal advice. If the legal advice is that the law is unconstitutional, then youare breaking your duty to the state by defending it - morally, and financially.
Slashdot Mirror
2 stroke != 2 cylinder. Its a 4 stroke 2 cylinder engine, used as a generator only so it always sits at peak efficiency
CAN come with, not COMES WITH. Learn the difference
Then you drive one, and realise it has more grip, and corners flatter, than you would ever believe.
A small cross section on a large diameter tyre still yields a large contact patch
Were scared into, misinformed and generally lied to in order to get them to vote against equal rights, removing an existing right and attempting to get gay couples forcibly divorced.
Get it right, dont gloss over the 8 campaign and the hatred and lies it was spewing.
No, he was trying to get rights taken away from a group of people that has no bearing on his own personal life, no impact whatsoever, just doing it because its icky / their religion said so.
The other group pointed out that this is MORE than a little shitty of the guy, and that maybe you shouldnt support the organisation that employs that person.
No, the justifications are: our religion says no!, and "its icky"
There are no rational justifications that have been proprosed in this, just, frankly, bullshit.
What, the activism that went "separate but equal isnt equal"?
No, you do not have the same rights to marry the consenting adult you love under Prop 8, thus not equal. Not difficult to understand as a concept.
This is a different argument to wanting to marry the 2+ consenting adults you love. Because, numbers matter.
Bollocks. Have SOME sense of history, and look up the word. Marriage is and was a civil institution first, religious second.
YOU dont get to define it as your reglion wants, and think that that has to apply to anyone else.
So youre relationship is so weak that two other peopel getting married affects you negatively?
Youre THAT pathetic and insecure?
Wow.
DISinformation to voters. Actual down to earth lies were told by that campaign deliberately to mislead and frighten voters.
It wasnt simply spreading factual information, but hate.
When those customers seek to remove the rights of others, then yes, hold them to the same standard
OK Cupid wasnt doing so, so your SOL there.
Same sex marriage was already legal, prop 8 removed that. Any chance youre NOT a retarded fuckwit with no knowledge of history on the topic your spouiting off about? No? OK then :)
Were OK Cupid trying to deny someone their rights? Or a group of people their rights?
No. So there is no same standard. Similar actions, very different motives and outcomes
So someone actively trying to take away your rights should not be called out as doing such?
Bigot, pure and simple.
Equal protection, idiot.
So someone else being married hurts you? Does someone eating a doughnut hurt you if yuoure trying to slim?
So youre equating consensual acts with rape? Wonderful
So hetero marriage is such an unstable concept that someone else being able to lvoe and marry the consenting adult they want to spend the rest of their lives with would give serious concerns to the stability of hetero marriage?
Its like banning everyone from eating doughnuts because youre on a diet, and eating doughnuts may cause your diet to crumble.
So you can get married to the peson you love, but a gay person cannot?
Gee, thanks.
Fuck off :)
Separate but equal huh?
No, you need to take appropriate legal advice. If the legal advice is that the law is unconstitutional, then youare breaking your duty to the state by defending it - morally, and financially.
So its genetic, but its a choice?
Fuck off, you know nothing piece of shit :)
No such proof exists, bigot. In fact there is more evidence the other way, that it is inate.
Or do you suggest that animals have free will?
No, the confusion is thinking that "marriage" is a religious word. It isnt, in root. ALL marriage was civil, initially.
Mariage is NOT A CHRISTIAN WORD. It is not "THEIR" word at all.