Slashdot Mirror


User: schwar

schwar's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. Re: Actually... on Globalization · · Score: 1

    I also believe that most of what you've said is right.

    But even so there is no way that America will ever make such a dramatic change to the way it does business.

    There's just too much inertia behind the current system for any serious changes in direction to take place.

  2. Re:Who's Kool Aid have you been drinking? on Will Open Source Lose the Battle for the Web? · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's webservices are XML over HTTP. Java webservices are for all I can tell RMI. There is only lip service paid to the uddi standard. Sun is pushing it's own vision of the future. Anyway the point is that if SOAP and UDDI are what wins Microsoft and IBM will own that market. MS more than likely taking the lower - medium end,IBM taking the upper market and I image linux taking the very low end. More than likely what we see today but with Java losing market share rather than gaining it.

  3. Re:The Australian government are clueless on Aussie Bill Would Ban Hacking Tools, Virus Code · · Score: 1

    As opposed to the US where you cant walk down the street for a loaf of bread without worrying about being gunned down by a gangsta with a minigun? Farmers, pig shooters and target shooters can get by just fine with the weapons that are legal here.

  4. Re:The War on Drugs is the only thing that makes s on Internet Drug Game Could Save Lives and Money · · Score: 1

    I agree, they should make all illicit drugs free and ban resuscitation of users who OD. Natural Selection will do the rest.

  5. Re:isn't this this country that... on Draconian Censorship Push In South Australia · · Score: 1

    Fortunately America doesnt have the same problem, Americans killed so many of your natives there arent enough left to make a fuss, and the survivors are kept out of harms way in reservations.

  6. Re:Woo hoo on Spielberg (And Kubrick)'s A.I. · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of an interesting article by Vernor Vinge (sci fi writer and Com Sci Prof?) about the possibility of creating superhuman intelligence.

    Its a thought provoking article if you have the time to read it
    http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~phoenix/vinge/vinge-s ing.html

  7. Re:Hmmm, I must be the luddite .... on Sega, Motorola To Load Games On New Phones · · Score: 1

    Havent you heard of convergance?

  8. Re:Garbage on Web Development With JSP · · Score: 1

    4-5 years ago applets were a strength.

    Over the last 5 years there has been enormous improvements in every aspect of Internet development.

    Likewise Java has also evolved and moved on.

  9. Re:I'm Not Convinced on Perl and .NET · · Score: 2

    Here is a good definition of .NET the basis of it I found on a messageboard somewhere but I've modified it a bit: What is .NET? In a nutshell, it is an architecture for allowing multiple languages to create executables which work on any platform (like Java, though with more multi-language emphasis). It is built with internet protocols as a foundation for intercommunication (SOAP is simply a technology to allow objects to be called over HTTP using XML as a serialization protocol). The framework includes standards for code packaging and distribution as well as security, something made easier by the completely self-describing nature of MSIL (Microsoft's analog to Java bytecodes(stand for Intermediate language)). Practically on windows this works much the same as activeX components. except instead of being registered.dll's they are code compiled into the IL with and XML wrapper exposing their methods/properties. Technologies such as ASP+ and WinForms are BUILT on .NET technologies, but are NOT .NET, something which is often confused in the Microsoft documentation.