This quick-n-dirty script parses the.aspx files on the above-mentioned pr0n site and leeches all of the.WMV movies without bothering to download the adverts.
Happy pr0n watching, slashdotters!
#!/bin/sh
for i in `seq 1 10000`; do wget -O ViewMovie-${i}.1 http://www.neox3.com/ViewMovie.aspx?ClipID=$i >/dev/null 2>&1 ASX=`grep 'SRC="BuildASX.aspx' ViewMovie-${i}.1` ASX='a='`echo -n "${ASX##*a=}" | sed s/[\"\'\ \)\;]//g | tr '\r' '\000'` echo "$ASX" | egrep '[0-9]' >/dev/null 2>&1 if [ "$?" == "0" ]; then wget -O ViewMovie-${i}.2 "http://www.neox3.com/BuildASX.aspx?$ASX" >/dev/null 2>&1 MMS=`grep -i mms: ViewMovie-${i}.2 | grep -v Ads | cut -f2 -d\"` echo Downloading $MMS \(${MMS##*/}\)... please wait... mplayer -dumpfile ${MMS##*/} -dumpstream $MMS >/dev/null 2>&1 rm -f ViewMovie-${i}.2 fi rm -f ViewMovie-${i}.1 done
As all the major news portals seem to be struggling under the load, check www.ananova.com - it's up, fast and stayed alive during September 11th. They seem to be up-to-the minute with their information too.
Whilst I think I'll be in line with the majority of people here by saying that child porn is wrong, sick and best left out of any society, there is a point here that needs raising.
In any society, there will be one section of people who appear as "unacceptable" or "twisted" to another section. Whether these sections are the minority or majority, who has the right to say what images (or sounds, experiences, smells etc) we are not allowed to generate electronically?
If it is possible for the powers that be to dictate what is acceptable to generate using technology, then where will this dictatorial power end?
The question is: is it right to decide what is and is not "acceptable use of technology", thereby setting a precedent for the future? Or should we say "there must be a morally defined limit for the application of technology" ? Who would decide on such morals? Who could veto such morals?
Slashdot Mirror
This quick-n-dirty script parses the .aspx files on the above-mentioned pr0n site and leeches all of the .WMV movies without bothering to download the adverts.
/dev/null 2>&1 /dev/null 2>&1 ... please wait ... /dev/null 2>&1
Happy pr0n watching, slashdotters!
#!/bin/sh
for i in `seq 1 10000`; do
wget -O ViewMovie-${i}.1 http://www.neox3.com/ViewMovie.aspx?ClipID=$i >
ASX=`grep 'SRC="BuildASX.aspx' ViewMovie-${i}.1`
ASX='a='`echo -n "${ASX##*a=}" | sed s/[\"\'\ \)\;]//g | tr '\r' '\000'`
echo "$ASX" | egrep '[0-9]' >
if [ "$?" == "0" ]; then
wget -O ViewMovie-${i}.2 "http://www.neox3.com/BuildASX.aspx?$ASX" >/dev/null 2>&1
MMS=`grep -i mms: ViewMovie-${i}.2 | grep -v Ads | cut -f2 -d\"`
echo Downloading $MMS \(${MMS##*/}\)
mplayer -dumpfile ${MMS##*/} -dumpstream $MMS >
rm -f ViewMovie-${i}.2
fi
rm -f ViewMovie-${i}.1
done
sol:/usr/src/linux # egrep -ri '(@sco\.|@caldera)' * 2>/dev/null_ audio.c: * 19-04-2001 Marcus Meissner <mm@caldera.de>
CREDITS:E: sp@caldera.de
arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c: * 1.0 16 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c: * 1.01 18 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c: * 1.02 21 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c: * 1.03 29 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
drivers/net/slip.c: * from Jim Freeman's <jfree@caldera.com>
drivers/net/tlan.c: * Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>: TLan_PciProbe() now uses
drivers/char/drm/drm_context.h: * 2001-11-16 Torsten Duwe <duwe@caldera.de>
drivers/scsi/ips.c:/* 4.00.06a - Port to 2.4 (trivial) -- Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de> */
drivers/scsi/advansys.c: Erik Ratcliffe <erik@caldera.com> has done testing of the
drivers/sound/esssolo1.c: * up. Marcus Meissner <mm@caldera.de>
drivers/sound/esssolo1.c: * Marcus Meissner <mm@caldera.de>
drivers/sound/maestro.c: * v0.15 - May 21 2001 - Marcus Meissner <mm@caldera.de>
drivers/sound/rme96xx.c: Marcus Meissner <Marcus.Meissner@caldera.de>
drivers/sound/nm256
drivers/sound/sonicvibes.c: * Meissner <mm@caldera.de>
fs/freevxfs/vxfs_olt.c:&nbs p; printk(KERN_NOTICE "vxfs: please notify hch@caldera.de\n");
net/ipx/af_ipx.c: * Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc. <greg@caldera.com>
net/ipx/af_spx.c: * Jim Freeman <jfree@caldera.com>
As all the major news portals seem to be struggling under the load, check www.ananova.com - it's up, fast and stayed alive during September 11th. They seem to be up-to-the minute with their information too.
Whilst I think I'll be in line with the majority of people here by saying that child porn is wrong, sick and best left out of any society, there is a point here that needs raising.
In any society, there will be one section of people who appear as "unacceptable" or "twisted" to another section. Whether these sections are the minority or majority, who has the right to say what images (or sounds, experiences, smells etc) we are not allowed to generate electronically?
If it is possible for the powers that be to dictate what is acceptable to generate using technology, then where will this dictatorial power end?
The question is: is it right to decide what is and is not "acceptable use of technology", thereby setting a precedent for the future? Or should we say "there must be a morally defined limit for the application of technology" ? Who would decide on such morals? Who could veto such morals?
----------------------------------------