again with the bullshit thesis that we risk the economy. news flash: we've had environmental regs since 1899. the economy has done fine in relation to them.
and that "wrong" would be the idea of a president bending over backwards (or just over) to please the leader of russia, a man guilty of assassination, violating human rights, and the illegal invasion of other nations (2 out of 3.... no wonder republicans like him so much). pleasing that sort of evil man is not something the "leader of the free world" should be doing.
that's what is wrong.
and thats why Merkel is now the LotFW. the US has abdicated.
also: government isnt decreeing WHAT goes on the wire, other than EVERYTHING gets to. that's the whole fucking point: stopping corporations who do want to decree what goes on the wire, from doing so.
I swear, this has been explained to you a million fucking times, but you stioll keep posting the same tired lies. it cannot be unintentional.
nope. still shill bullshit. the barriers to competition were created by the market (that whole thing where competition inevitably destroys itself...basic econ theory stuff), not the government. Net Neutrality doesnt impair competition, it enhances it.
last part is still incorrect. youve reverse the cause of effect.
loans came about AFTER tuitions began rising, and in response to that. and they began rising because previously they were held low by colleges being funded primarily with taxes. but the tax funds went away in the tax cut mania of the 70s and 80s.
loans came about AFTER tuitions began rising, and in response to that. and they began rising because previously they were held low by colleges being funded primarily with taxes. but the tax funds went away in the tax cut mania of the 70s and 80s.
basically, where college was largely publicly funded before, it was turned into a for profit industry via the student loan program after the tax funds went away.
Well, that provide for general welfare, has to be taken in the meaning of the day, not as "welfare" as we think of it today. Basically general welfare as used in the constitution was defined as the overall state of wellbeing of the nation as a whole.
Then so does "provide for the defense", which "in the meaning of the day" most certainly DID NOT mean the permanent standing military of the size and scope that we have today.
It wasnt just proximity to humans that cause the first domestication event in wolves (or really, several parallel events), but conditions that also resulted animals with less aggression, which was then amplified by captive breeding.
this event isnt structured to provide that reduction in aggression. but it will provide an increase in guile.
every democrat judge currently on the court has been a moderate with broad bipartisan support. every republican judge currently on teh court other than Kennedy has been a conservative ideologue with little bipartisan support. care to try again?
Slashdot Mirror
libertarians claim it every day.
including on this very forum.
again with the bullshit thesis that we risk the economy.
news flash: we've had environmental regs since 1899.
the economy has done fine in relation to them.
go peddle your bullshit somewhere else shill.
says one of the biggest spewers of bullshit and dismisser of facts on /.
there is a far cry between "debate" and "letting Milo, Coulter, or Spencer spew their filth."
calling their bullshit debate gives them veneer of respectability that they in no way deserve.
you misspelled republican.
Bingo.
I got conservative bullshit bingo.
and that "wrong" would be the idea of a president bending over backwards (or just over) to please the leader of russia, a man guilty of assassination, violating human rights, and the illegal invasion of other nations (2 out of 3.... no wonder republicans like him so much). pleasing that sort of evil man is not something the "leader of the free world" should be doing.
that's what is wrong.
and thats why Merkel is now the LotFW.
the US has abdicated.
power little snowflake.
awwwww.
poor little snowflake.
also: government isnt decreeing WHAT goes on the wire, other than EVERYTHING gets to.
that's the whole fucking point: stopping corporations who do want to decree what goes on the wire, from doing so.
I swear, this has been explained to you a million fucking times, but you stioll keep posting the same tired lies.
it cannot be unintentional.
you ever get tired of posting bullshit?
he's paid to be stupid.
nope.
still shill bullshit.
the barriers to competition were created by the market (that whole thing where competition inevitably destroys itself...basic econ theory stuff), not the government.
Net Neutrality doesnt impair competition, it enhances it.
you have been saying this for years.
it is still wrong.
fuck off troll.
last part is still incorrect.
youve reverse the cause of effect.
loans came about AFTER tuitions began rising, and in response to that.
and they began rising because previously they were held low by colleges being funded primarily with taxes.
but the tax funds went away in the tax cut mania of the 70s and 80s.
incorrect.
historical fact is the reverse.
loans came about AFTER tuitions began rising, and in response to that.
and they began rising because previously they were held low by colleges being funded primarily with taxes.
but the tax funds went away in the tax cut mania of the 70s and 80s.
basically, where college was largely publicly funded before, it was turned into a for profit industry via the student loan program after the tax funds went away.
Well, that provide for general welfare, has to be taken in the meaning of the day, not as "welfare" as we think of it today. Basically general welfare as used in the constitution was defined as the overall state of wellbeing of the nation as a whole.
Then so does "provide for the defense", which "in the meaning of the day" most certainly DID NOT mean the permanent standing military of the size and scope that we have today.
Basically your argument is shit.
im not sure we'll make it past the next 4....or 1.
begone you fucking shill
pissed they got it...
and pissed it actually does work.
not as well as single payer.
but better than the status quo before it.
and it wont result in dogs 2.0
It wasnt just proximity to humans that cause the first domestication event in wolves (or really, several parallel events), but conditions that also resulted animals with less aggression, which was then amplified by captive breeding.
this event isnt structured to provide that reduction in aggression.
but it will provide an increase in guile.
this isnt dogs 2.0
this is coyotes 2.0
every democrat judge currently on the court has been a moderate with broad bipartisan support.
every republican judge currently on teh court other than Kennedy has been a conservative ideologue with little bipartisan support.
care to try again?
oh shut the fuck up you ignorant moron.
the only people more ignorant than conservatives are these fools who keep saying "they're both the same"
says a man with no concept of history or what marx actually wrote.