Well, it can see further than the ground and means you can probably get rid of the AWACS planes. It's unmanned and the project is far far cheaper than a single AWACS plane.
"You're mostly right, but I wouldn't call the LibDems centrist."
To be honest I wouldn't either if we analyse things, it's a simplification. I really don't think the old left/right thing applies any more. They have policies which could be considered left wing, but also policies which could be considered right wing, so do Labour for that matter.
Election debates? I'm yet not sure whether they are a gimmick or are really useful for enunciating policies and challenging politicians.
In the UK we have a similar state of 2 party politics however, there is a 3rd party gaining ground at the expense of the main 2. The Liberal Democrats, a centrist party.
They are starting to take serious chunks of support at a national level and they've done it by concentrating at a local level first. Get seats on local councils first, target resources at councils where you are most likely to gain seats or win. Leverage the councils and council seats to demonstrate competence.
It's taken 20 years so far and realistically they're still well back in 3rd place but as their vote increases, the other parties are having to take account of and answer questions posed by the LibDems, in addition, there are now no majority parties at all, it's painfully obvious that the existing electoral system is not up to the task of representing the population.
Lovely in theory, but the sole purpose of very first GM products on the market was to allow the manufacturer to sell more herbicide!
Not only that, but they then have the temerity to go and prosecute people who's fields have been contaminated by their products for patent infringement. They should be made responsible for clearing up gene flow. After all the bloody stuff is now immune to the conventional herbicides.
The kind of easy you can give to children and complete beginners who've never seen a computer before. You can get into it as deeply as you like, it's basically smalltalk.
e.g. http://www.squeakland.org/
It should really be the default development environment for normal users on Linux desktops.
Contradiction? How does making use of technology to ensure free dissemination of information and guaranteed continued operation any way contradict free, open source, open protocols. It's *all* about personal freedom and not only from governments, no excuses necessary.
The keys can be stored anywhere in the world. The only reason for any European personnel to even have permission to access them is busibess convenience, if security is important they could be administered from anywhere.
It's basically the same API as the Mac OSX so apps written for GNUStep should build relatively painlessly on the Mac, though I'm not sure it implements enough of the API for the reverse to be true.
I've found that KDE is quite a bit more responsive than Gnome, especially running applications remotely, it's difficult to tell when KDE apps are remote but performance wasn't mentioned. Has this changed for the latest versions?
Yeah, instead of plugging your laptop into the mains to recharge when the battery runs down, you'll be stuffed if you can't find a computer shop supplying the particular model of container which fits into the proprietary fuel cell adaptor built into your machine.
For safety. All that big metal, doesn't necessarily help safety. Jeeps and one of the GM SUVs in particular did badly in the past. They seem to be improving now, but they're really still no better than other big cars.
Well, it can see further than the ground and means you can probably get rid of the AWACS planes. It's unmanned and the project is far far cheaper than a single AWACS plane.
70,000 feet is 13 miles straight up. You got something that can shoot that far?
"You're mostly right, but I wouldn't call the LibDems centrist."
To be honest I wouldn't either if we analyse things, it's a simplification. I really don't think the old left/right thing applies any more. They have policies which could be considered left wing, but also policies which could be considered right wing, so do Labour for that matter.
Election debates? I'm yet not sure whether they are a gimmick or are really useful for enunciating policies and challenging politicians.
In the UK we have a similar state of 2 party politics however, there is a 3rd party gaining ground at the expense of the main 2. The Liberal Democrats, a centrist party.
They are starting to take serious chunks of support at a national level and they've done it by concentrating at a local level first. Get seats on local councils first, target resources at councils where you are most likely to gain seats or win. Leverage the councils and council seats to demonstrate competence.
It's taken 20 years so far and realistically they're still well back in 3rd place but as their vote increases, the other parties are having to take account of and answer questions posed by the LibDems, in addition, there are now no majority parties at all, it's painfully obvious that the existing electoral system is not up to the task of representing the population.
"the goal of most GM projects, that I know of, is to modify something so that it most benefits humans."
Sorry, too naive. The goal is to increase profits. Ask Monsanto.
Canola plants and rape plants can cross pollinate. They are the same species.
For everyone outside America, it's Rapeseed oil.
Lovely in theory, but the sole purpose of very first GM products on the market was to allow the manufacturer to sell more herbicide!
Not only that, but they then have the temerity to go and prosecute people who's fields have been contaminated by their products for patent infringement. They should be made responsible for clearing up gene flow. After all the bloody stuff is now immune to the conventional herbicides.
What about leisure sailing? Can it integrate with the stuff published by the Admiralty?
Electronic Admiralty maps/software are currently Windows only. Anyone know of Linux stuff?
The kind of easy you can give to children and complete beginners who've never seen a computer before. You can get into it as deeply as you like, it's basically smalltalk.
e.g.
http://www.squeakland.org/
It should really be the default development environment for normal users on Linux desktops.
Interesting the concentration round the industrial north of Italy as you say, bounded by the mountain ranges.
Carrying crowbars, knives, screwdrivers is an offense.
/ 2f a0cfe7d9867e6480256baa005c13bf?OpenDocument
http://www.police-law.co.uk/law/policelaw.nsf/0
It all depends on intent and use.
It's not compulsory.
Contradiction? How does making use of technology to ensure free dissemination of information and guaranteed continued operation any way contradict free, open source, open protocols. It's *all* about personal freedom and not only from governments, no excuses necessary.
And AFS is a global filesystem with multiple replicated servers which can be placed all over the world.
The keys can be stored anywhere in the world. The only reason for any European personnel to even have permission to access them is busibess convenience, if security is important they could be administered from anywhere.
Pretty much solves that problem...
i on -HOWTO/Encryption-HOWTO-4.html
Using an encrypted device, e.g.
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/docs/HOWTO/Encrypt
And use AFS on top of that in order to provide global redundancy.
http://www.openafs.org/
It's basically the same API as the Mac OSX so apps written for GNUStep should build relatively painlessly on the Mac, though I'm not sure it implements enough of the API for the reverse to be true.
I've found that KDE is quite a bit more responsive than Gnome, especially running applications remotely, it's difficult to tell when KDE apps are remote but performance wasn't mentioned. Has this changed for the latest versions?
The anthrax would be cooked in seconds.
Yeah, instead of plugging your laptop into the mains to recharge when the battery runs down, you'll be stuffed if you can't find a computer shop supplying the particular model of container which fits into the proprietary fuel cell adaptor built into your machine.
"Such is the way of politics."
It's the electoral system which strongly encourages a two party state. Change that, you fundamentally change the political makeup.
For safety. All that big metal, doesn't necessarily help safety. Jeeps and one of the GM SUVs in particular did badly in the past. They seem to be improving now, but they're really still no better than other big cars.
It really only needs to be able to do 25mph. It's as tall as any other car and can be seen fine.
"just don't force your decision on everyone else."
WTF?