OK, now you get to try defending that. And we get to laugh at your efforts.
No, as you don't understand logic, we won't try to make you believe she was 20. We'll ban your dirty companies/products on our soil, and for sure those who spread hatred, understand money clearly. Remember The Merchant of Venice.
This movie is a dirty satire and has nothing to do with the facts. So, why not refer to "evidence" instead of spreading hatred based on wrong allegations? Referring to evidence can help us to get out of ambiguity. The thing I understood in these serial insulations is the role of ignorance. The pastor who burned Quran, said in an interview that he didn't actually read Quran!
If you believe in "free speech", let people criticize holocaust industry and don't label, insult and punish the authors. "Free speech wherever its beneficial" is a bad idea.
I'm focusing on "You" in that sentence. If I respect your free speech, I'll give you the right to criticize me. If you claim you respect free speech, then you insult me and you don't let me even say a criticism of your insulation, then I can call you a hypocrite. Don't take it personally, I'm talking about governments and rights of people.
He should be jailed for spreading hate speech, not accessing Internet while being under probation. Free speech is letting others criticize you, so letting stupids like Nakoula insult more than 1.5 billion people has nothing to do with free speech.
How did you conclude this? As an Iranian, I see that even people who are not usually considered religious, feel bothered from the movie and comdemen it. But with the fact that access to Youtube was blocked even before today, many people don't know how hateful, annoying and sadistic that damn stupid movie is.
According to Lancet, nearly 1 million people have been killed in Iraq beacause of fake allegations of weapons of mass destruction, so It's a reasonable conclusion for muslims to confront spread of haterad by United states. I would like to remind you that even now, us has a military base in Japan and ever since, there has neumerous reports of rape and torture of Japanese women by US military personnel.
I feel sorry for the Iranian people, who by-and-large, are reasonably normal, but are stuck with a crap theocratic government through little fault of their own.
The whole story is a fake allegation about building nationwide network backbone that many countries already have. Right now, a lot of websites owned by Iranian governments are hosted outside the country and the whole network of the country is dependent on servers located in countries like United States that can cause troubles for e-Government systems of Iran with just a few clicks.
So, they've decided to create an Intranet and several data centers for hosting government websites and serving e-Government services. This has nothing to do with the Internet and privately owned Iranian websites. Why give people Internet and then take it from them and give them Intranet? If the report's claim was true, they could simply don't give internet to the people in the first place.
The funny thing is that when other countries create Intranets for fast and seamless access to information in a nationwide network, everybody appreciate the progress. But it seems that any progress in Iran is considered a threat by some technophobes.
If you're really serious, go and stop Google from invading your privacy, if you can, in a non-theocratic democratic peace-loving country like United States!
Slashdot Mirror
OK, now you get to try defending that. And we get to laugh at your efforts.
No, as you don't understand logic, we won't try to make you believe she was 20. We'll ban your dirty companies/products on our soil, and for sure those who spread hatred, understand money clearly. Remember The Merchant of Venice.
This movie is a dirty satire and has nothing to do with the facts. So, why not refer to "evidence" instead of spreading hatred based on wrong allegations? Referring to evidence can help us to get out of ambiguity. The thing I understood in these serial insulations is the role of ignorance. The pastor who burned Quran, said in an interview that he didn't actually read Quran!
We should not apologize for free speech
If you believe in "free speech", let people criticize holocaust industry and don't label, insult and punish the authors. "Free speech wherever its beneficial" is a bad idea.
I'm focusing on "You" in that sentence. If I respect your free speech, I'll give you the right to criticize me. If you claim you respect free speech, then you insult me and you don't let me even say a criticism of your insulation, then I can call you a hypocrite.
Don't take it personally, I'm talking about governments and rights of people.
He should be jailed for spreading hate speech, not accessing Internet while being under probation. Free speech is letting others criticize you, so letting stupids like Nakoula insult more than 1.5 billion people has nothing to do with free speech.
the public in general doesn't seem bothered by it
How did you conclude this? As an Iranian, I see that even people who are not usually considered religious, feel bothered from the movie and comdemen it. But with the fact that access to Youtube was blocked even before today, many people don't know how hateful, annoying and sadistic that damn stupid movie is.
According to Lancet, nearly 1 million people have been killed in Iraq beacause of fake allegations of weapons of mass destruction, so It's a reasonable conclusion for muslims to confront spread of haterad by United states. I would like to remind you that even now, us has a military base in Japan and ever since, there has neumerous reports of rape and torture of Japanese women by US military personnel.
I feel sorry for the Iranian people, who by-and-large, are reasonably normal, but are stuck with a crap theocratic government through little fault of their own.
The whole story is a fake allegation about building nationwide network backbone that many countries already have. Right now, a lot of websites owned by Iranian governments are hosted outside the country and the whole network of the country is dependent on servers located in countries like United States that can cause troubles for e-Government systems of Iran with just a few clicks.
So, they've decided to create an Intranet and several data centers for hosting government websites and serving e-Government services. This has nothing to do with the Internet and privately owned Iranian websites. Why give people Internet and then take it from them and give them Intranet? If the report's claim was true, they could simply don't give internet to the people in the first place.
The funny thing is that when other countries create Intranets for fast and seamless access to information in a nationwide network, everybody appreciate the progress. But it seems that any progress in Iran is considered a threat by some technophobes.
If you're really serious, go and stop Google from invading your privacy, if you can, in a non-theocratic democratic peace-loving country like United States!