You are one of the few people on here who seem to get the facts right. And you expressed them very well! People just seem to want to slam people for the sake of slamming them. They don't actually read what the issue is, and then make dumb comments. I ask then, who is the real idiot? The one with a legitimate issue, or the one who makes an uneducated romper room remark? I know the correct answer.
Yes, it is misleading. He's suing HarperCollins and the author of the other book with the same title. And he's not suing the reviewers. I think the author of the story this thread is related to did not do his diligent research.
I agree. He's sued Harper Collins as he should. He even tried to stop them before they released it. Now he's got to send out legal stuff to people to let them know and try to get them to take it down. I hope Harper has to pay him every bit of profit and legal fees.
Slashdot Mirror
You are one of the few people on here who seem to get the facts right. And you expressed them very well! People just seem to want to slam people for the sake of slamming them. They don't actually read what the issue is, and then make dumb comments. I ask then, who is the real idiot? The one with a legitimate issue, or the one who makes an uneducated romper room remark? I know the correct answer.
Yes, it is misleading. He's suing HarperCollins and the author of the other book with the same title. And he's not suing the reviewers. I think the author of the story this thread is related to did not do his diligent research.
If it's prior to his mark, it's okay. It's anything after his mark that's in trouble.
I agree. He's sued Harper Collins as he should. He even tried to stop them before they released it. Now he's got to send out legal stuff to people to let them know and try to get them to take it down. I hope Harper has to pay him every bit of profit and legal fees.